Suppr超能文献

重复经颅磁刺激治疗创伤后应激障碍:利弊

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder: Lights and shadows.

作者信息

Concerto Carmen, Lanza Giuseppe, Fisicaro Francesco, Pennisi Manuela, Rodolico Alessandro, Torrisi Giulia, Bella Rita, Aguglia Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania 95124, Italy.

Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 16;10(17):5929-5933. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5929.

Abstract

We have read with interest the publication that describes the available data related to the use of neuromodulation strategies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite treatment advances, however, a substantial proportion of PTSD patients receiving psychological and/or pharmacological treatment do not reach an adequate clinical response. In their paper, the authors draw attention to the current understanding of the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a potential treatment for PTSD. Most of the previous studies indeed applied both inhibitory (1 Hz) and excitatory (> 1 Hz, up to 20 Hz) rTMS to the right and/or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Despite larger therapeutic effects observed when high-frequency stimulation was applied, the question of which side and frequency of stimulation is the most successful is still debated. The authors also reported on the after-effect of rTMS related to neuroplasticity and identified the intermittent theta burst stimulation as a technique of particular interest because of it showed the most effective improvement on PTSD symptoms. However, although numerous studies have highlighted the possible beneficial use of rTMS protocols for PTSD, the exact mechanism of action remains unclear. In their conclusions, the authors stated that rTMS has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of PTSD symptoms. Nevertheless, we believe that further research with homogeneous samples, standardized protocols, and objective outcome measures is needed to identify specific therapeutic targets and to better define significant changes when active and sham stimulation procedures are compared.

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了一篇关于使用神经调节策略治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的现有数据的论文。然而,尽管治疗取得了进展,但接受心理和/或药物治疗的PTSD患者中仍有很大一部分未达到足够的临床反应。在他们的论文中,作者提请人们关注目前对重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为PTSD潜在治疗方法的理解。此前的大多数研究确实对右侧和/或左侧背外侧前额叶皮层同时应用了抑制性(1Hz)和兴奋性(>1Hz,最高20Hz)rTMS。尽管高频刺激时观察到更大的治疗效果,但关于刺激的哪一侧和频率最为有效的问题仍存在争议。作者还报告了与神经可塑性相关的rTMS后效应,并将间歇性theta爆发刺激确定为特别值得关注的技术,因为它对PTSD症状显示出最有效的改善。然而,尽管众多研究强调了rTMS方案对PTSD可能的有益用途,但其确切作用机制仍不清楚。在结论中,作者指出rTMS已被证明对治疗PTSD症状有效。尽管如此,我们认为需要使用同质样本、标准化方案和客观结果测量进行进一步研究,以确定具体的治疗靶点,并在比较主动刺激和假刺激程序时更好地定义显著变化。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
A comprehensive review of transcranial magnetic stimulation in secondary dementia.经颅磁刺激治疗继发性痴呆的综合综述
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 26;14:995000. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.995000. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

4
Borderline personality traits do not influence response to TMS.边缘型人格特质并不影响 TMS 的反应。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:834-838. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.054. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验