Sobocinska Magdalena, Białecki Marcin, Sobocinski Bartosz, Martynowska Ida, Ciescinski Jakub
Department of Radiology, The Kuyavian and Pomeranian Pulmonology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jul 15;87:e392-e396. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.118303. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of contrast enhancement (CE) and experience of observers on the assessment of chest lymph nodes in patients with sarcoidosis.
A retrospective analysis of chest lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) examinations, including CE and non-contrast-enhanced (non-CE) phase, was performed on 40 patients with proven diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Phases were separated, anonymized, and randomized. The assessment was performed by 5 observers: 2 general radiologists, 2 residents, and a senior chest CT expert.
There were no significant differences between radiologists and residents, apart from the determination of the 4R node short diameter on CE images. Agreement between the reference observer and both residents and specialists was equally high, without any significant difference in the assessment all chest nodes and hilar nodes, and between non-CE and CE images. There was a significant difference between all observers in the determination of the largest 4R node short diameter on non-CE images, but not on CE images. The number of affected node levels was found to be significantly higher when evaluated on CE images than on non-CE images. Compared to CE images, non-CE computed tomography has sensitivity of 0.94-1.00 and specificity of 0.98-1.00, depending on the observer.
The application of contrast medium has a limited impact on the quality of assessment of the chest lymph nodes in patients with sarcoidosis, regardless of the experience of the observer.
本研究旨在评估对比增强(CE)和观察者经验对结节病患者胸部淋巴结评估的影响。
对40例经证实诊断为结节病的患者的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查中的淋巴结进行回顾性分析,包括CE期和非对比增强(非CE)期。各期图像进行分离、匿名化处理并随机排列。由5名观察者进行评估:2名普通放射科医生、2名住院医师和1名胸部CT资深专家。
除CE图像上4R组淋巴结短径的测定外,放射科医生和住院医师之间无显著差异。参考观察者与住院医师和专家之间的一致性同样很高,在所有胸部淋巴结和肺门淋巴结的评估以及非CE和CE图像之间均无显著差异。在非CE图像上所有观察者对最大4R组淋巴结短径的测定存在显著差异,但在CE图像上无差异。发现CE图像上评估的受累淋巴结水平数量显著高于非CE图像。与CE图像相比,非CE计算机断层扫描的敏感性为0.94 - 1.00,特异性为0.98 - 1.00,具体取决于观察者。
无论观察者的经验如何,造影剂的应用对结节病患者胸部淋巴结评估质量的影响有限。