Suppr超能文献

糖尿病对重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者血流储备分数诊断性能的影响。

Impact of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Dziewierz Artur, Rzeszutko Łukasz, Dudek Dariusz, Legutko Jacek, Kleczyński Paweł

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Clinical Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(12):1217-1223. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0194. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The validity of functional assessment of coronary artery disease with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) might be affected by AS per se and other factors, including diabetes mellitus.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetic status on FFR performance in severe AS.

METHODS

The functional significance of 416 stenoses of intermediate angiographic severity in 221 patients with severe AS was assessed with iFR and FFR. Patients treated with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents were classified as diabetic patients.

RESULTS

Of 221 enrolled patients, 68 (32.1%) patients were diabetic. A total of 128 (30.8%) lesions in patients with and 288 in patients without diabetes mellitus were assessed. The mean (SD) FFR was 0.85 (0.07), and iFR was 0.90 (0.04) with no difference between nondiabetic and diabetic patients. Good agreement between iFR and FFR was confirmed for non-diabetic (ICC, 0.83 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.79-0.86]) and diabetic (ICC, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.87]) patients. Among patients without diabetes mellitus, the optimal cutoff value for FFR to detect iFR ≤0.89 was 0.81 with sensitivity and specificity of 96.6% and 100.0%. The optimal cutoff value for FFR to detect iFR ≤0.89 for diabetic patients was 0.83 with sensitivity and specificity of 98.0% and 100.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS, FFR correlates well with iFR. However, the optimal threshold for FFR to identify significant ischemia (iFR ≤0.89) in those patients may differ from the standard threshold of FFR ≤0.80 and might be affected by the diabetic status.

摘要

背景

在严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中,采用血流储备分数(FFR)和/或瞬时无波比值(iFR)对冠状动脉疾病进行功能评估的有效性可能会受到AS本身及其他因素(包括糖尿病)的影响。

目的

我们旨在评估糖尿病状态对严重AS患者FFR表现的影响。

方法

采用iFR和FFR对221例严重AS患者的416处血管造影中度狭窄病变的功能意义进行评估。接受胰岛素或口服降糖药治疗的患者被归类为糖尿病患者。

结果

在221例入组患者中,68例(32.1%)为糖尿病患者。共评估了糖尿病患者中的128处(30.8%)病变和非糖尿病患者中的288处病变。非糖尿病患者和糖尿病患者的平均(标准差)FFR为0.85(0.07),iFR为0.90(0.04),两者无差异。对于非糖尿病患者(组内相关系数,ICC,0.83[95%置信区间,CI,0.79 - 0.86])和糖尿病患者(ICC,0.82[95%CI,0.76 - 0.87]),iFR与FFR之间具有良好的一致性。在非糖尿病患者中,检测iFR≤0.89时FFR的最佳截断值为0.81,敏感性和特异性分别为96.6%和100.0%。糖尿病患者检测iFR≤0.89时FFR的最佳截断值为0.83,敏感性和特异性分别为98.0%和100.0%。

结论

在严重AS患者中,FFR与iFR相关性良好。然而,在这些患者中识别显著缺血(iFR≤0.89)时FFR的最佳阈值可能不同于FFR≤0.80的标准阈值,并且可能受糖尿病状态影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验