From the Comprehensive Stroke Center (A.R.-V., C.L., A.R., S.R., L.L., S.A., V.O., V.V., X.U., A.C.), Functional Unit of Cerebrovascular Diseases.
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (A.R., S.R., L.L., S.A., V.O., X.U., A.C.), Barcelona, Spain.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1265-1270. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7601. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
CTP allows estimating ischemic core in patients with acute stroke. However, these estimations have limited accuracy compared with MR imaging. We studied the effect of applying WM- and GM-specific thresholds and analyzed the infarct growth from baseline imaging to reperfusion.
This was a single-center cohort of consecutive patients ( = 113) with witnessed strokes due to proximal carotid territory occlusions with baseline CT perfusion, complete reperfusion, and follow-up DWI. We segmented GM and WM, coregistered CTP with DWI, and compared the accuracy of the different predictions for each voxel on DWI through receiver operating characteristic analysis. We assessed the yield of different relative CBF thresholds to predict the final infarct volume and an estimated infarct growth-corrected volume (subtracting the infarct growth from baseline imaging to complete reperfusion) for a single relative CBF threshold and GM- and WM-specific thresholds.
The fixed threshold underestimated lesions in GM and overestimated them in WM. Double GM- and WM-specific thresholds of relative CBF were superior to fixed thresholds in predicting infarcted voxels. The closest estimations of the infarct on DWI were based on a relative CBF of 25% for a single threshold, 35% for GM, and 20% for WM, and they decreased when correcting for infarct growth: 20% for a single threshold, 25% for GM, and 15% for WM. The combination of 25% for GM and 15% for WM yielded the best prediction.
GM- and WM-specific thresholds result in different estimations of ischemic core in CTP and increase the global accuracy. More restrictive thresholds better estimate the actual extent of the infarcted tissue.
CTP 可用于评估急性卒中患者的缺血核心区。然而,与磁共振成像相比,这些评估的准确性有限。我们研究了应用 WM 和 GM 特异性阈值的效果,并分析了从基线成像到再灌注的梗死进展。
这是一项单中心连续患者队列研究(n=113),这些患者由于近端颈动脉区域闭塞导致的卒中发作,有基线 CT 灌注、完全再灌注和随访 DWI。我们对 GM 和 WM 进行分割,对 CTP 与 DWI 进行配准,并通过接收者操作特征分析比较不同预测方法在 DWI 上每个体素的准确性。我们评估了不同相对 CBF 阈值对预测最终梗死体积和估计梗死增长校正体积(从基线成像到完全再灌注减去梗死增长)的效果,包括单个体积相对 CBF 阈值和 GM 和 WM 特异性阈值。
固定阈值低估了 GM 中的病变,高估了 WM 中的病变。双 GM 和 WM 特异性相对 CBF 阈值在预测梗死体素方面优于固定阈值。基于单个体积相对 CBF 阈值(25%)、GM 为 35%、WM 为 20%,DWI 上梗死的估计最接近,当校正梗死增长时,估计值会降低:单个体积相对 CBF 为 20%、GM 为 25%、WM 为 15%。25%的 GM 和 15%的 WM 的组合产生了最佳预测效果。
GM 和 WM 特异性阈值导致 CTP 中缺血核心区的不同估计,提高了整体准确性。更严格的阈值可以更好地估计实际梗死组织的范围。