Stroke Unit, DAI Di Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Interventional Neurovascular Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Oct;54(3):550-557. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02692-8. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
The ability of the current grading systems to predict optimal outcomes in stroke patients with favourable collaterals remains unexplored. We evaluated differences in the performance of grading systems between Careggi Collateral Score and ASITN/SIR collateral score to predict clinical and radiological outcomes in stroke patients with favourable collaterals who underwent thrombectomy. We included stroke patients receiving thrombectomy within 360 min after symptom onset with MCA occlusion and favourable collaterals (i.e., without poor collaterals) defined by ASITN/SIR collateral score between 2 and 4. Using ordinal regression, we estimated the association of each CCS and ASITN/SIR grade with mRS shift (0-6) at 3 months, NIHSS score (0-42) and ASPECT score (10-0) at baseline, TICI score (3-0), infarct growth, cerebral bleeding, and cerebral edema grading at 24 h by calculating the odds ratios (ORs) with two-sided 95% confidence intervals after adjustment for predefined variables. Using the best collateral grade (CCS = 4) as reference, ORs of the CCS grades were associated in the direction of unfavourable outcome on 3-month mRS shift (2.325 for CCS = 3; 5.092 for CCS = 2), in the direction of more severe baseline NIHSS score (5.434 for CCS = 3; 16.041 for CCS = 2), 24-h infarct growth (2.659 for CCS = 3; 8.288 for CCS = 4) and 24-h cerebral edema (1.057 for CCS = 3; 5.374 for CCS = 2) shift. ORs of the ASITN/SIR grades were associated in the direction of more severe baseline NIHSS score (4.332 for ASITN/SIR = 3; 16.960 for ASITN/SIR = 2) and 24-h infarct growth (2.138 for ASITN/SIR = 3; 7.490 for ASITN/SIR = 2) shift. The AUC ROC of CCS and ASITN/SIR for predicting 3-month mRS score 0-1 were 0.681 (95% CI: 0.562-0.799; p = 0.009) and 0.599 (95% CI: 0.466-0.73; p = 0.156), respectively. CCS = 4 and ASITN/SIR ≥ 3 were the optimal cut-offs to predict 3-month mRS score 0-1, respectively. CCS grading system performed better than the ASITN/SIR collateral score predicting 3-month mRS score and 24-h CED grading in stroke patients with favourable collaterals who received thrombectomy for MCA occlusion.
目前的分级系统预测具有有利侧支循环的中风患者的最佳结局的能力仍未得到探索。我们评估了 Careggi 侧支循环评分和 ASITN/SIR 侧支循环评分之间的分级系统在接受血栓切除术治疗具有有利侧支循环的中风患者中的表现差异,以预测这些患者的临床和影像学结局。我们纳入了在症状发作后 360 分钟内接受血栓切除术治疗的 MCA 闭塞和具有有利侧支循环(即 ASITN/SIR 侧支循环评分在 2 至 4 之间没有侧支循环不良)的中风患者。使用有序回归,我们通过计算优势比(OR)来估计每个 CCS 和 ASITN/SIR 等级与基线时 mRS 变化(0-6)、NIHSS 评分(0-42)和 ASPECT 评分(10-0)、基线时 TICI 评分(3-0)、24 小时内梗死进展、脑出血和脑水肿分级之间的关联,在调整预定义变量后,使用双侧 95%置信区间计算 OR。使用最佳侧支循环等级(CCS=4)作为参考,CCS 等级的 OR 与 3 个月 mRS 变化(CCS=3 为 2.325;CCS=2 为 5.092)、基线时 NIHSS 评分更严重(CCS=3 为 5.434;CCS=2 为 16.041)、24 小时内梗死进展(CCS=3 为 2.659;CCS=4 为 8.288)和 24 小时内脑水肿(CCS=3 为 1.057;CCS=2 为 5.374)有关。ASITN/SIR 等级的 OR 与基线时 NIHSS 评分更严重(ASITN/SIR=3 为 4.332;ASITN/SIR=2 为 16.960)和 24 小时内梗死进展(ASITN/SIR=3 为 2.138;ASITN/SIR=2 为 7.490)有关。CCS 和 ASITN/SIR 预测 3 个月 mRS 评分 0-1 的 AUC ROC 分别为 0.681(95%CI:0.562-0.799;p=0.009)和 0.599(95%CI:0.466-0.73;p=0.156)。CCS=4 和 ASITN/SIR≥3 是预测 3 个月 mRS 评分 0-1 的最佳截断值。CCS 分级系统在接受 MCA 闭塞血栓切除术治疗的具有有利侧支循环的中风患者中预测 3 个月 mRS 评分和 24 小时 CED 分级方面的表现优于 ASITN/SIR 侧支循环评分。