Suppr超能文献

基于国家指南,判断对接触到 SARS-CoV-2 阳性同事的医护人员进行隔离的决策是否恰当。

The appropriateness of the decision to quarantine healthcare workers exposed to a severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive coworker based on national guidelines.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;44(6):920-925. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.198. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the appropriateness of the decision to quarantine healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary-care medical center in Israel.

PARTICIPANTS

HCWs exposed to a coworker infected with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

METHODS

Quarantined and nonquarantined HCWs were followed for up to 1 month following exposure and their COVID-19 status was determined. The validity of the decision to quarantine was assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 2,595 HCWs exposed to 419 confirmed index cases were studied. Of the contact cases, 752 HCWs were quarantined and 1,843 HCWs were not. Of those quarantined, 36 became SARS-CoV-2 positive (4.7%). Among those who were not quarantined, only 13 (0.7%) became SARS-CoV-2 positive, which translated to a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 71.9% for the decision to quarantine (positive and negative predictive values: 4.7% and 99.3%, respectively). Controlling for confounders, the decision to quarantine the HCW by the Israeli Ministry of Health guidelines was associated with a significant risk of becoming SARS-CoV-2 positive (RR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.98-7.36; = .001). If a nonselective policy was used, 11,700 working days would have been lost (902 working days lost per positive case).

CONCLUSIONS

An efficient and tight system of HCW contact investigations served its purpose in our hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was based on HCW reports and reported adherence to safety regulations, and these findings are relevant to the massive pandemic waves due to the SARS-CoV-2 α (alpha) variant. These Methods demonstrate an effective way of handling risk without causing damage due to arbitrary risk-control measures.

摘要

目的

探讨因接触 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)确诊患者而对医护人员(HCW)进行隔离的决策是否合理。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

以色列一家三级保健医疗中心。

参与者

接触过感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的同事的 HCW。

方法

对接触者进行随访,直至暴露后 1 个月,并确定其 COVID-19 状态。评估隔离决策的合理性。

结果

共研究了 2595 名接触 419 例确诊指数病例的 HCW。在接触者中,有 752 名 HCW 被隔离,1843 名 HCW 未被隔离。在被隔离的 36 名 HCW 中,有 36 人(4.7%)COVID-19 检测呈阳性。在未被隔离的 HCW 中,只有 13 人(0.7%)COVID-19 检测呈阳性,这表明隔离决策的敏感性为 73.5%,特异性为 71.9%(阳性和阴性预测值分别为 4.7%和 99.3%)。在控制混杂因素后,以色列卫生部指南中隔离 HCW 的决策与 COVID-19 检测呈阳性的风险显著相关(RR,3.83;95%CI,1.98-7.36; =.001)。如果采用非选择性政策,将损失 11700 个工作日(每例阳性病例损失 902 个工作日)。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们医院高效、严格的 HCW 接触调查系统达到了预期目的。本研究基于 HCW 的报告和对安全规定的报告遵守情况,这些发现与 SARS-CoV-2 α(alpha)变体引起的大规模大流行浪潮有关。这些方法展示了一种在不造成任意风险控制措施损害的情况下有效处理风险的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验