Ebbehøj Anders L, Smith Henry G, Jørgensen Lars N, Krarup Peter-Martin
Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):127-135. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005684. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is a differential impact of histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastases (LNM) in pedunculated and nonpedunculated pT1 colorectal cancers (CRC). BACKGROUND: Tumor budding, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and venous invasion (VI) are recognized risk factors for LNM in pT1 CRC. Whether the importance of these factors varies according to tumor morphology is unknown. METHODS: Patients undergoing resection with lymphadenectomy for pT1 CRC in Denmark from January 2016 to January 2019 were identified in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Database and clinicopathological data was reviewed. Prognostic factors for LNM were investigated using multivariable analyses on the cohort as a whole as well as when stratifying according to tumor morphology (pedunculated vs. nonpedunculated). RESULTS: A total of 1167 eligible patients were identified, of whom 170 had LNM (14.6%). Independent prognostic factors for LNM included LVI [odds ratio (OR)=4.26, P <0.001], VI (OR=3.42, P <0.001), tumor budding (OR=2.12, P =0.002), high tumor grade (OR=2.76, P =0.020), and age per additional year (OR=0.96, P <0.001). On subgroup analyses, LVI and VI remained independently prognostic for LNM regardless of tumor morphology. However, tumor budding was only prognostic for LNM in pedunculated tumors (OR=4.19, P <0.001), whereas age was only prognostic in nonpedunculated tumors (OR=0.61, P =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: While LVI and LI were found to be prognostic of LNM in all pT1 CRC, the prognostic value of tumor budding differs between pedunculated and nonpedunculated tumors. Thus, tumor morphology should be taken into account when considering completion surgery in patients undergoing local excision.
目的:探讨有蒂和无蒂pT1期结直肠癌(CRC)中,淋巴结转移(LNM)的组织病理学危险因素是否存在差异影响。 背景:肿瘤芽生、淋巴管侵犯(LVI)和静脉侵犯(VI)是pT1期CRC中公认的LNM危险因素。这些因素的重要性是否因肿瘤形态而异尚不清楚。 方法:在丹麦结直肠癌数据库中识别出2016年1月至2019年1月在丹麦接受pT1期CRC切除并进行淋巴结清扫的患者,并回顾其临床病理数据。使用多变量分析对整个队列以及根据肿瘤形态(有蒂与无蒂)分层时的LNM预后因素进行研究。 结果:共识别出1167例符合条件的患者,其中170例发生LNM(14.6%)。LNM的独立预后因素包括LVI[比值比(OR)=4.26,P<0.001]、VI(OR=3.42,P<0.001)、肿瘤芽生(OR=2.12,P=0.002)、高肿瘤分级(OR=2.76,P=0.020)以及每增加一岁(OR=0.96,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,无论肿瘤形态如何,LVI和VI仍然是LNM的独立预后因素。然而,肿瘤芽生仅在有蒂肿瘤中对LNM具有预后意义(OR=4.19,P<0.001),而年龄仅在无蒂肿瘤中具有预后意义(OR=0.61,P=0.003)。 结论:虽然发现LVI和LI在所有pT1期CRC中对LNM具有预后意义,但肿瘤芽生在有蒂和无蒂肿瘤中的预后价值不同。因此,在考虑对接受局部切除的患者进行根治性手术时应考虑肿瘤形态。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024-4-3
J Clin Pathol. 2024-3-20
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024-12