School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Body Image. 2022 Dec;43:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
Despite growing interest in the possible link between positive body image and eating disorder (ED) symptoms, little is known about what role this adaptive construct plays in ED treatment. This study investigated whether: (1) interventions principally designed to target ED psychopathology also lead to improvements in positive body image indices (i.e., body appreciation, functionality appreciation, and body image flexibility); (2) changes in ED symptoms correlate with changes in positive body image, both concurrently and prospectively; and (3) baseline positive body image levels moderate the degree of symptom improvement. Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial on digital interventions for EDs (n=600) were conducted. Intervention participants reported greater increases in the three positive body image constructs than the control group (ds=0.15-0.41). Greater pre-post reductions in ED psychopathology and binge eating were associated with greater pre-post improvements in positive body image indices. However, earlier reductions in ED psychopathology and binge eating did not predict later improvements in positive body image at follow-up. None of the positive body image constructs at baseline moderated degree of symptom change. Standard ED interventions can cultivate a more positive body image, although this is not explained by earlier symptom reduction. Understanding the mechanisms through which ED interventions enhance positive body image is needed.
尽管人们对积极的身体形象与饮食失调(ED)症状之间可能存在联系的兴趣日益浓厚,但对于这一适应性结构在 ED 治疗中的作用知之甚少。本研究调查了以下几点:(1)主要旨在针对 ED 病理的干预措施是否也能改善积极的身体形象指数(即身体欣赏、功能欣赏和身体形象灵活性);(2)ED 症状的变化是否与积极身体形象的变化相关,包括同时和前瞻性变化;(3)积极身体形象的基线水平是否能调节症状改善的程度。对 ED 数字干预的随机对照试验(n=600)进行了二次分析。与对照组相比,干预组报告的三个积极身体形象结构的增加更大(ds=0.15-0.41)。ED 精神病理学和暴食的预先减少与积极身体形象指数的预先改善相关。然而,ED 精神病理学和暴食的早期减少并不能预测随访时积极身体形象的后期改善。基线时的任何积极身体形象结构都不能调节症状变化的程度。标准 ED 干预措施可以培养更积极的身体形象,尽管这不能用早期症状的减轻来解释。需要了解 ED 干预措施增强积极身体形象的机制。