Estonian University of Life Science, Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, 51014 Tartu, Estonia.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Nov;208:105717. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105717. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
African swine fever (ASF) has been present in Estonia since 2014, and pigkeepers play a major role in controlling the spread of viral infection in domestic pigs. Participatory epidemiology may provide insight into livestock keepers' existing attitudes and compliance with implementing control strategies. By conducting focus group discussions and using participatory epidemiology tools, this study aimed to reveal pigkeepers' knowledge and awareness of ASF clinical signs, transmission routes, and preventive measures. Furthermore, opinions including trust in stakeholders in ASF control, acceptability of ASF eradication, and control measures by pigkeepers in Estonia were identified. The most indicative ASF signs in pigs were "increased mortality" and "fever, inappetence, lethargy". The highest risk of virus introduction into the herd was designated to "agricultural machinery, vehicles", "rodents, birds, insects", and "people". "Fencing" was the most liked ASF preventive measure, while "training of staff in biosecurity and informing the visitors" was considered the most effective measure. The least accepted ASF eradication measure was "culling of all animals on the farm". Generally, pigkeepers perceived that healthy animals should not be culled but only ASF-infected pigs. Additionally, healthy pigs could be slaughtered and used for the production of heat-treated canned meat. "Destroying the feed" of ASF-infected farms was not favoured because some pigkeepers proposed using it for other animal species. Regarding ASF territorial restrictions (zoning), "lower meat prices" and "economic losses" were regarded as consequences with the greatest impact. Pigkeepers ranked trust in "Veterinary Authority and Ministry of Rural Affairs" regarding their role in ASF prevention and control as high while perceiving themselves as the most trustworthy stakeholder within the ASF network. This study demonstrates a generally good level of awareness among the pigkeepers in Estonia concerning the clinical manifestation of ASF, the most relevant transmission routes of the virus for their farms, and preventive measures for ASF. Pigkeepers are aware of their own role in preventing ASF, and there is a high level of trust between them and government authorities. Additional efforts are needed from authorities to communicate better the purpose of some ASF control and eradication measures to the pigkeepers. Further incentives are required to support the implementation of costly biosecurity measures, assure compliance, and mitigate the consequences of these measures.
非洲猪瘟(ASF)自 2014 年以来一直在爱沙尼亚流行,养猪户在控制家猪病毒感染传播方面发挥着重要作用。参与式流行病学可以深入了解牲畜饲养者对实施控制策略的现有态度和遵守情况。本研究通过开展焦点小组讨论和使用参与式流行病学工具,旨在揭示养猪户对 ASF 临床症状、传播途径和预防措施的了解和认识。此外,还确定了对 ASF 控制利益相关者的信任、对 ASF 根除的接受程度以及爱沙尼亚养猪户的控制措施等意见。猪群中最具代表性的 ASF 症状是“死亡率增加”和“发热、食欲不振、嗜睡”。病毒传入畜群的最高风险被指定为“农业机械、车辆”、“啮齿动物、鸟类、昆虫”和“人”。“围栏”是养猪户最喜欢的 ASF 预防措施,而“对员工进行生物安全培训并告知访客”则被认为是最有效的措施。养猪户最不接受的 ASF 根除措施是“扑杀农场内所有动物”。一般来说,养猪户认为不应扑杀健康动物,而只应扑杀感染 ASF 的猪。此外,健康的猪可以被屠宰并用于生产热处理罐装肉。由于一些养猪户提议将 ASF 感染农场的饲料用于其他动物物种,因此不赞成“销毁饲料”。关于 ASF 地区限制(分区),“肉价下跌”和“经济损失”被认为是影响最大的后果。养猪户对“兽医局和农村事务部”在 ASF 预防和控制方面的作用给予高度信任,同时认为自己是 ASF 网络中最值得信赖的利益相关者。本研究表明,爱沙尼亚的养猪户对 ASF 的临床表现、对其农场最相关的病毒传播途径以及 ASF 的预防措施有较高的认知水平。养猪户意识到自己在预防 ASF 方面的作用,并且他们与政府当局之间存在高度的信任。当局需要进一步努力,以便更好地向养猪户传达一些 ASF 控制和根除措施的目的。需要进一步的激励措施来支持实施昂贵的生物安全措施,确保遵守这些措施,并减轻这些措施的后果。