Iwakoshi Shinichi, Ogawa Yukihisa, Dake Michael D, Ono Yusuke, Higashihara Hiroki, Ikoma Akira, Nakai Motoki, Taniguchi Takanori, Ogi Takahiro, Kawada Hiroshi, Tamura Akio, Ieko Yoshirou, Tanaka Ryoichi, Sohgawa Etsuji, Nagatomi Satoru, Woodhams Reiko, Ikeda Osamu, Mori Kensaku, Nishimaki Hiroshi, Koizumi Jun, Senokuchi Terutoshi, Hagihara Makiyo, Shimohira Masashi, Takasugi Shohei, Imaizumi Akira, Higashiura Wataru, Sakaguchi Shoji, Ichihashi Shigeo, Inoue Takeshi, Inoue Takashi, Kichikawa Kimihiko
Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):114-121.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.168. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and clarify the risk factors for aneurysm enlargement after embolization procedures.
This was a retrospective multicenter registry study enrolling patients who underwent embolization procedures for type II endoleaks after EVAR from January 2012 to December 2018 at 19 Japanese centers. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement, more than 5 mm in the aortic maximum diameter, after an embolization procedure. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and laboratory data were collected. Continuous variables were summarized descriptively, and Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox regression model were used for statistical analyses.
A total of 315 patients (248 men and 67 women) were enrolled. The average duration from the initial embolization procedure to the last follow-up was 31.6 ± 24.6 months. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 and 5 years were 55.4 ± 3.8% and 37.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a larger aortic diameter at the initial embolization procedure and the presence of a Moyamoya endoleak, defined as heterogeneous contrast opacity with an indistinct faint border, were associated with aneurysm enlargement after embolization management.
The embolization procedures were generally ineffective in preventing further expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR, especially in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or a presence of a Moyamoya endoleak.
本研究旨在调查血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后II型内漏栓塞治疗的中期疗效,并明确栓塞治疗后动脉瘤扩大的危险因素。
这是一项回顾性多中心注册研究,纳入了2012年1月至2018年12月期间在日本19个中心接受血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后II型内漏栓塞治疗的患者。主要终点是栓塞治疗后主动脉最大直径增加超过5 mm的动脉瘤扩大自由度。收集了人口统计学、手术、随访和实验室数据。连续变量进行描述性总结,并采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归模型进行统计分析。
共纳入315例患者(248例男性和67例女性)。从初次栓塞治疗到最后一次随访的平均时间为31.6±24.6个月。3年和5年的动脉瘤扩大自由度分别为55.4±3.8%和37.0±5.2%。多变量分析显示,初次栓塞治疗时较大的主动脉直径以及烟雾状内漏(定义为边界不清的不均匀造影剂充盈)与栓塞治疗后动脉瘤扩大相关。
血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后II型内漏患者的栓塞治疗通常无法有效预防腹主动脉瘤的进一步扩张,尤其是腹主动脉瘤较大和/或存在烟雾状内漏的患者。