Suppr超能文献

颞下颌关节紊乱治疗效果评估指标:系统评价。

Therapy outcome measures in temporomandibular disorder: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

Aihara Clinic, Hirosaki, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e061387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061387.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Therapy outcome measures (TOMs) in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) have not been systematically evaluated. We systematically explored the main TOM assessment methods for TMD TOMs used in previous studies.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Review reporting guidelines, we systematically searched five key databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Epistemonikos and ClinicalTrials) and thoroughly scanned relevant grey literature using Medical Subject Headings, Emtree and index terms.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We considered primary research papers published from January 2010 to December 2020 that included patients with TMD aged ≥18 years, diagnosed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Four reviewers extracted general information and information on study design and setting, target, interventions, and outcome type.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two of the 3726 screened articles (3704 by search engines and 22 manually) were included. The TOMs analysed included pain (n=161 articles), maximal mouth opening (MMO) (91), jaw function (32), jaw movement (26), joint sound (16), quality of life (QOL) (15), depression/anxiety (14), oral QOL (10) or others (30). Evaluation periods were <4 weeks (111), <8 weeks (62), <12 weeks (59), >12 weeks (75) or 'not mentioned' (12). Pain outcomes (229) included general pain (115), tenderness (45), pain during functioning (44), resting pain (16) and others (8). Pain outcome evaluation methods included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 121), Numerical Rating Scale (21) and other methods (21). Pain outcome indicators were binary (10) or continuous (158); only five studies reported the least significant difference in treatment efficacy. MMO evaluation using painless methods (19) and jaw function evaluation using methods assessing mandibular movement range (23) were the most frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

TMD TOMs are diverse; the major outcomes were pain, MMO, jaw function and jaw movement. Most pain outcomes are evaluated by VAS Score changes.

摘要

目的

颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)的治疗结果测量(TOM)尚未得到系统评估。我们系统地探讨了之前研究中用于 TMD TOM 的主要 TOM 评估方法。

设计

范围综述。

数据来源

根据系统评价和扩展的首选报告项目,我们系统地搜索了五个关键数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Epistemonikos 和 ClinicalTrials),并使用医学主题词、Emtree 和索引词彻底扫描了相关的灰色文献。

入选标准

我们考虑了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间发表的主要研究论文,这些论文包括年龄≥18 岁的 TMD 患者,根据颞下颌关节紊乱的诊断标准进行诊断。

数据提取和综合

四名评审员提取了一般信息以及研究设计和设置、目标、干预措施和结果类型的信息。

结果

在筛选出的 3726 篇文章中,有 172 篇(3704 篇通过搜索引擎筛选,22 篇通过手动筛选)被纳入。分析的 TOM 包括疼痛(n=161 篇)、最大张口度(MMO)(91 篇)、下颌功能(32 篇)、下颌运动(26 篇)、关节音(16 篇)、生活质量(QOL)(15 篇)、抑郁/焦虑(14 篇)、口腔生活质量(10 篇)或其他(30 篇)。评估期<4 周(111 篇)、<8 周(62 篇)、<12 周(59 篇)、>12 周(75 篇)或“未提及”(12 篇)。疼痛结果(229 篇)包括一般疼痛(115 篇)、压痛(45 篇)、功能时疼痛(44 篇)、静息疼痛(16 篇)和其他(8 篇)。疼痛结果评估方法包括视觉模拟量表(VAS;121 篇)、数字评分量表(21 篇)和其他方法(21 篇)。疼痛结果指标为二进制(10 篇)或连续(158 篇);只有 5 项研究报告了治疗效果的最小差异。使用无痛方法评估 MMO(19 篇)和使用评估下颌运动范围的方法评估下颌功能(23 篇)是最常见的。

结论

TMD 的 TOM 种类繁多,主要结果是疼痛、MMO、下颌功能和下颌运动。大多数疼痛结果通过 VAS 评分变化来评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a181/9396127/a3f830ae6adc/bmjopen-2022-061387f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验