Door No. 1-3, Near Thottambedu, Sub Treasury Office, Opposite Dharmarajula Temple, Chennai Road, Sri Kalahasti, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh - 517640, India.
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India, Phone: +91 8297403929, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 May 1;23(5):513-519.
To compare and evaluate the mean bite force and masticatory performance of conventional complete dentures (CD) in comparison with the lower implant-supported overdenture opposing an upper CD by using a strain gauge transducer and a test material respectively, in the same patient over a different period of time.
The study included 20 edentulous patients in the age range 45-65 years with a good general and oral health. In the first phase of the study, conventional CD were fabricated and delivered to each patient who participated in the study. A strain gauge transducer was used to analyze the maximum bite force and an agar test material was used to assess the masticatory performance using the sieve method. The existing lower denture was used to deliver a two-implant overdenture system and two implants were placed in the intermental-foraminal region of the mandible. One month after the delivery of implant-supported overdenture, the maximum bite force and masticatory performance were assessed as before.
To test two independent variables, the data were analyzed statistically using an unpaired -test. In comparison to the conventional upper and lower CD rehabilitations, the implant-supported lower denture and conventional upper CD rehabilitations resulted in statistically significant improvements in biting force and masticatory performance.
Study findings demonstrate that the completely edentulous patients can be rehabilitated with the upper CD and lower two-implant supported overdenture system that offers improved biting force and masticatory performance than conventional upper and lower dentures.
Masticatory efficiency is one of the important indicators of functional state of stomatognathic system. Determination of individual masticatory performance has been used to ascertain the therapeutic effect of prosthetic device.
通过使用应变片传感器和测试材料,分别比较和评估常规全口义齿(CD)与下种植体支持覆盖义齿对上 CD 的平均咬合力和咀嚼性能,在同一患者中在不同时间段。
本研究纳入了 20 名年龄在 45-65 岁之间、一般和口腔健康状况良好的无牙颌患者。在研究的第一阶段,为每位参与研究的患者制作并交付常规 CD。使用应变片传感器分析最大咬合力,使用琼脂测试材料通过筛法评估咀嚼性能。使用现有的下义齿交付双种植体覆盖义齿系统,并在下颌骨的颌间-眶区放置两个种植体。在交付种植体支持覆盖义齿后 1 个月,再次评估最大咬合力和咀嚼性能。
为了测试两个独立变量,使用配对 t 检验对数据进行了统计学分析。与常规上下 CD 修复相比,种植体支持的下颌义齿和常规上 CD 修复在咬合力和咀嚼性能方面均有显著改善。
研究结果表明,完全无牙的患者可以通过上 CD 和下两个种植体支持覆盖义齿系统进行修复,与常规上下义齿相比,可提供更好的咬合力和咀嚼性能。
咀嚼效率是口颌系统功能状态的重要指标之一。确定个体的咀嚼性能已被用于确定修复体的治疗效果。