Furber S, Oppenheim R W, Prevette D
J Neurosci. 1987 Jun;7(6):1816-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-06-01816.1987.
With only a few exceptions, most investigations of the mechanisms involved in naturally-occurring neuron death have focused on interactions between neurons and their targets, with much less attention having been paid to the possible role of the afferent inputs in this phenomenon. This is true of the avian ciliary ganglion (CG), which is composed of a population of peripheral autonomic neurons that project to smooth and striated musculature in the eye and which receive afferents from a single source, the accessory oculomotor nucleus (AON), which is the avian homolog of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus. Although several lines of evidence strongly support the important role of targets in regulating the death and survival of CG neurons, the role of afferents has not yet been systematically examined. Following the destruction of the AON on embryonic day (E) 4, which is several days before the onset of normal cell death in the CG, we have found that by the end of the normal cell death period (E14-E15), 85-90% of the CG neurons degenerate and die, compared to 50% in controls. This is comparable to the amount of induced cell loss that occurs following removal of the optic vesicle containing the CG targets. The neurons surviving after deafferentation appear to be sustained by some influence from their targets since combined deafferentation and eye removal results in the loss of virtually all neurons in the CG. Following deafferentation of the CG on E4, the ganglion develops normally up to about E10, after which a precipitous loss of cells occurs. Based on several kinds of evidence (e.g., axon counts, silver stain, retrograde labeling of the CG), we conclude that the deafferented neurons project to and innervate their muscular targets in the eye. Therefore, the increased cell death following deafferentation cannot be due to the failure of deafferented neurons to contact their targets. The deafferented neurons undergo a normal sequence of initial ultrastructural differentiation. When they do begin to degenerate, the type of fine structural changes they exhibit appears indistinguishable from the degenerative changes observed in control embryos. Neurons in deafferented ganglia were occasionally observed to receive synaptic contacts, which we attribute to aberrant intraganglionic connections induced by deafferentation. These contacts probably play little, if any, role in the maintenance of neurons since, as noted above, following combined deafferentation and target deletion virtually all neurons degenerate and die.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
除了少数例外情况,大多数关于自然发生的神经元死亡机制的研究都集中在神经元与其靶标之间的相互作用上,而对传入输入在这一现象中可能发挥的作用关注较少。鸟类睫状神经节(CG)的情况就是如此,它由一群外周自主神经元组成,这些神经元投射到眼睛的平滑肌和横纹肌,并且从单一来源——动眼神经副核(AON)接收传入神经,AON是艾丁格 - 韦斯特法尔核的鸟类同源物。尽管有几条证据有力地支持了靶标在调节CG神经元死亡和存活中的重要作用,但传入神经的作用尚未得到系统研究。在胚胎第4天(E4)破坏AON,这比CG中正常细胞死亡开始提前几天,我们发现到正常细胞死亡期结束时(E14 - E15),85 - 90%的CG神经元退化并死亡,而对照组为50%。这与去除含有CG靶标的视泡后诱导的细胞损失量相当。去传入神经后存活的神经元似乎受到其靶标的某种影响而得以维持,因为联合去传入神经和摘除眼球会导致CG中几乎所有神经元的损失。在E4对CG进行去传入神经处理后,如果没有其他因素影响,神经节在大约E10之前正常发育,之后细胞数量急剧减少。基于多种证据(如轴突计数、银染、CG的逆行标记),我们得出结论,去传入神经的神经元投射到并支配眼睛中的肌肉靶标。因此,去传入神经后细胞死亡增加并非由于去传入神经的神经元无法与靶标接触。去传入神经的神经元经历了正常的初始超微结构分化序列。当它们开始退化时,所表现出的精细结构变化类型似乎与对照胚胎中观察到的退化变化无法区分。偶尔会观察到去传入神经的神经节中的神经元接受突触接触,我们将其归因于去传入神经诱导的异常神经节内连接。这些接触可能对神经元的维持作用很小,如果有作用的话,因为如上所述,联合去传入神经和靶标缺失后几乎所有神经元都会退化并死亡。(摘要截取自400字)