Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec;116(6):1270-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
In October 2018, the United States implemented a change in the donor heart allocation policy from a three-tiered to a six-tiered status system. The purpose of the current study was to examine changes in waitlist patterns among patients listed for concomitant heart-liver transplantation with implementation of the new allocation system.
Patients listed for heart-liver transplantation between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2021, were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were grouped by era according to initial list date before or after October 18, 2018. Competing risks regression for mortality, transplantation, removal from waitlist due to illness was performed according to the method of Fine and Gray. Waitlist data were censored at 3 years from initial listing.
Overall, 523 patients were identified, of whom 310 were listed before (era 1, 59%) and 213 after (era 2, 41%) allocation change. Patients in era 1 were older, had more restrictive cardiomyopathy, and more preoperative inotrope use (all P < .05). However, patients in era 2 has longer ischemic times (3.5 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.1 hours, P < .01) and more intraaortic balloon pump use (8.9% vs 3.9%, P = .016). Era 2 was associated with lower subdistribution hazard for death (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI, 0.13-1.02; P = .054) and increased transplantation (hazard ratio 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06-1.72; P = .015).
The implementation of the US donor heart allocation policy was associated with more preoperative intraaortic balloon pump use for patients listed for heart-liver transplantation. Despite that, the modern era was associated with lower waitlist mortality and more frequent transplantation, without increased risk of delisting due to illness.
2018 年 10 月,美国将供体心脏分配政策从三级改为六级状态系统。本研究的目的是研究在新分配系统实施后,同时进行心脏-肝脏移植的患者名单上的等待模式的变化。
从器官共享联合网络数据库中确定 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间接受心脏-肝脏移植的患者。根据最初列入名单的日期,将患者分为实施前(2018 年 10 月 18 日前,时代 1,59%)和实施后(时代 2,41%)两组。采用 Fine 和 Gray 方法对死亡率、移植、因病从候补名单中除名进行竞争风险回归。候补名单数据在初始列入后 3 年截止。
总体上,确定了 523 名患者,其中 310 名患者在分配变更前(时代 1,59%),213 名患者在分配变更后(时代 2,41%)。时代 1 的患者年龄较大,限制性心肌病较多,术前使用正性肌力药物较多(均 P <.05)。然而,时代 2 的患者缺血时间较长(3.5±1.1 小时与 3.1±1.1 小时,P <.01),主动脉内球囊泵使用率较高(8.9%与 3.9%,P =.016)。时代 2 患者的死亡亚分布风险较低(危险比 0.37;95%CI,0.13-1.02;P =.054),移植率较高(危险比 1.35;95%CI,1.06-1.72;P =.015)。
美国供体心脏分配政策的实施与接受心脏-肝脏移植的患者名单上更多的术前主动脉内球囊泵使用有关。尽管如此,在现代时代,候补名单上的死亡率较低,移植率较高,而因病除名的风险并未增加。