University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2358-2360. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7252. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Waitzberg and colleagues' research explores hospital managers, chief physicians and other physicians in German and Israeli hospitals, making use of thematic analysis to explore what they call 'dilemmas' between the commitments to clinical needs, and their hospitals' financial sustainability. This commentary will provide a summary of the paper, into which I will embed some items I will follow-up on in my second half. The second half will then explore these items in greater depth, considering the strengths and weaknesses of the article. I then make some suggestions for future work based around the findings the authors present in terms of managerial and clinical identity, how compromises are reached in hospital settings, and how we compare different health systems.
维茨伯格和同事的研究以德国和以色列的医院管理人员、首席医师和其他医师为研究对象,采用主题分析的方法,探讨了他们所谓的在满足临床需求和医院财务可持续性之间的“困境”。本评论将对该论文进行概述,我将在第二部分中阐述我将跟进的一些内容。然后,第二部分将更深入地探讨这些内容,考虑文章的优缺点。接着,我将根据作者在管理和临床身份方面提出的发现,以及在医院环境中如何达成妥协以及如何比较不同的卫生系统方面,提出一些未来工作的建议。