Suppr超能文献

含漱剂预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疗效:一项前瞻性随机安慰剂对照的初步研究。

Efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinses against SARS-CoV-2: A prospective randomized placebo-controlled pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;43(6):103549. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103549. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Coronavirus-disease-19 (COVID-19) continues to affect millions of individuals worldwide. Antiviral activity of mouthrinses remains an important research area as the oral cavity is a site of SARS-CoV-2 initial replication. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three different mouthrinses in reducing the oral/oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load.

METHODS

Adult patients, hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 were recruited for the study. Oral/oropharyngeal baseline SARS-CoV-2 samples were collected and analyzed by Real-Time-PCR. Subsequently, patients were instructed to rinse with 1 % hydrogen peroxide (HO), 0.12 % chlorhexidine (CHX), 1 % povidone‑iodine (PVP-I) or Sodium Chloride 0.9 % (placebo). Viral loads were measured right after (T1), and at 45 min (T2) from the rinse.

RESULTS

In the PVP-I 1 % group, 5/8 (62.5 %) patients at T1, and 3/8 (37.5 %) patients at T2, SARS-CoV-2 was not detectable in the swab specimens. In the HO 1 % group, 2/11 (18.2 %) patients at T1, and 2/11 (18.2 %) other patients at T2 showed no SARS-CoV-2 loads. One (12.5 %) patient in the CHX 0.12 % group showed SARS-CoV-2 negativity at T2. One (9.1 %) patient at T1, and another (9.1 %) patient at T2 showed no SARS-CoV-2 loads in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral SARS-CoV-2 loads were reduced at T1 in the PVP-I 1 % and HO 1 % groups.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PVP-I 1 % was the most effective rinse especially in patients with low viral copy numbers at baseline.

摘要

目的

新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)继续在全球范围内影响数百万人。漱口水的抗病毒活性仍然是一个重要的研究领域,因为口腔是 SARS-CoV-2 初始复制的部位。本研究旨在评估三种不同漱口水在降低口腔/咽 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量方面的有效性。

方法

这项研究招募了因确诊 COVID-19 而住院的成年患者。采集口腔/咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 基线样本,并用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行分析。随后,指导患者用 1%双氧水(HO)、0.12%洗必泰(CHX)、1%聚维酮碘(PVP-I)或 0.9%生理盐水(安慰剂)漱口。在漱口后即刻(T1)和 45 分钟(T2)测量病毒载量。

结果

在 1%PVP-I 组中,T1 时 8 例中有 5 例(62.5%),T2 时 8 例中有 3 例(37.5%)患者的拭子标本中检测不到 SARS-CoV-2。在 1%HO 组中,T1 时 11 例中有 2 例(18.2%),T2 时 11 例中有 2 例(18.2%)患者的拭子标本中检测不到 SARS-CoV-2。0.12%CHX 组中 1 例(12.5%)患者 T2 时 SARS-CoV-2 阴性。在安慰剂组中,T1 时 1 例(9.1%),T2 时 1 例(9.1%)患者的拭子标本中检测不到 SARS-CoV-2。

结论

在 PVP-I 1%和 HO 1%组中,T1 时口腔 SARS-CoV-2 载量降低。

临床意义

PVP-I 1%是最有效的漱口水,尤其是在基线病毒载量较低的患者中。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinses against SARS-CoV-2: A prospective randomized placebo-controlled pilot study.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;43(6):103549. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103549. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Efficacy of mouthrinses in reducing oral SARS-COV-2 load: a review.
Braz Oral Res. 2023 Apr 28;37:e038. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2023.vol37.0038. eCollection 2023.
4
Efficacy of commercial mouth-rinses on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva: randomized control trial in Singapore.
Infection. 2021 Apr;49(2):305-311. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01563-9. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Effectiveness of mouth rinses against COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Sep;139:175-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Comparison of In Vitro Inactivation of SARS CoV-2 with Hydrogen Peroxide and Povidone-Iodine Oral Antiseptic Rinses.
J Prosthodont. 2020 Aug;29(7):599-603. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13220. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Mouth rinses efficacy on salivary SARS-CoV-2 viral load: A randomized clinical trial.
J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28412. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28412.
9
Use of mouthwashes against COVID-19 in dentistry.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;58(8):924-927. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
10
Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Nasal and Oral Antiseptic Preparations Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Apr;100(2_suppl):192S-196S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320957237. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of antiseptic mouth rinses to reduce salivary load of SARS-CoV-2.
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 22;11(1):24392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03461-y.
5
Mouthwashes with CPC Reduce the Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 Variants In Vitro.
J Dent Res. 2021 Oct;100(11):1265-1272. doi: 10.1177/00220345211029269. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
6
Could certain mouthwashes reduce transmissibility of COVID-19?
Evid Based Dent. 2021 Jan;22(2):82-83. doi: 10.1038/s41432-021-0172-4.
7
What is the rate of COVID-19 infection in a population seeking oral health care?
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Jun;152(6):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva.
Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):892-903. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01296-8. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Use of chlorhexidine to eradicate oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients.
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4370-4373. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26954. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Aug;19(8):528-545. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00535-6. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验