Ingraham L J, Wright T L
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1212-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1212.
Interpersonal relationships and mutual influence are important aspects of both personality and behavior. However, empirical tests of mutual influence in anxiety have not occurred because of difficulties in design and assessment. In this report, we present a study of two training groups of graduate students and a study of an outpatient psychotherapy group. In both studies relationship-specific variance was significant and accounted for a substantial proportion of the systematic variance. In the training groups, there were also significant individual differences in experienced anxiety. These studies support the importance of relationships in anxiety but not Sullivan's hypothesis of the exclusive interpersonal nature of anxiety (Sullivan, 1964). The results address Endler and Magnusson's (1976a, 1976b) interactional approach to anxiety by assessing dynamic interaction rather than mechanistic interaction. In addition, these studies extend the use of the Social Relations Model to a new area, anxiety, and demonstrate its use in separating relationship-specific adjustments in anxiety from individual differences in anxiety.
人际关系和相互影响是人格与行为的重要方面。然而,由于设计和评估方面的困难,尚未对焦虑中的相互影响进行实证检验。在本报告中,我们展示了一项针对两组研究生培训群体的研究以及一项针对门诊心理治疗群体的研究。在这两项研究中,特定关系的方差均具有显著性,且在系统方差中占相当大的比例。在培训群体中,所体验到的焦虑也存在显著的个体差异。这些研究支持了人际关系在焦虑中的重要性,但并不支持沙利文关于焦虑具有排他性人际本质的假设(沙利文,1964年)。通过评估动态互动而非机械互动,研究结果回应了恩德勒和马格努松(1976a,1976b)关于焦虑的互动方法。此外,这些研究将社会关系模型的应用扩展到了一个新领域——焦虑,并展示了其在区分焦虑中特定关系调整与焦虑个体差异方面的用途。