• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

讲师对学生对其授课技巧评分分析结果的反应。

Reaction of lecturers to analysis results of student ratings of their lecture skills.

作者信息

Baggott J

出版信息

J Med Educ. 1987 Jun;62(6):491-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198706000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-198706000-00006
PMID:3599037
Abstract

Lecturers in a medical biochemistry course were evaluated by medical students with respect to overall impression and seven specific characteristics expected to predict overall impression. Each lecturer's ratings were subjected to stepwise multiple regression analysis to identify the characteristics that best accounted for the students' overall impression. The results were fed back to the lecturers, and each lecturer was subsequently interviewed. The interviews revealed that 60 percent of the lecturers had not correctly interpreted the analysis. Half of the lecturers expressed interest in improving their performance, and 20 percent of the lecturers requested specific, detailed guidance in overcoming problems. The author concludes that multivariate analysis of student ratings can generate feedback specific enough to guide teacher improvement but that it is essential to present the information to the faculty in conjunction with individual discussions.

摘要

在一门医学生物化学课程中,医学生对讲师在总体印象以及预计能预测总体印象的七个具体特征方面进行了评价。对每位讲师的评分进行逐步多元回归分析,以确定最能解释学生总体印象的特征。结果反馈给了讲师,随后对每位讲师进行了访谈。访谈显示,60%的讲师没有正确解读分析结果。一半的讲师表示有兴趣提高自己的表现,20%的讲师要求提供具体、详细的指导以解决问题。作者得出结论,对学生评分进行多变量分析可以产生足够具体的反馈以指导教师改进,但必须结合个别讨论向教师们呈现这些信息。

相似文献

1
Reaction of lecturers to analysis results of student ratings of their lecture skills.讲师对学生对其授课技巧评分分析结果的反应。
J Med Educ. 1987 Jun;62(6):491-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198706000-00006.
2
Medical student and academic staff perceptions of role models: an analytical cross-sectional study.医学生和学术人员对榜样的看法:一项分析性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Feb 17;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-9.
3
The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.书面标准化反馈对外科讲座结构和质量的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0806-y.
4
The validity of lecturer ratings by students and trained observers.学生和经过培训的观察者对讲师评分的有效性。
Acad Med. 1991 Jan;66(1):26-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199101000-00008.
5
Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.电子投票促进互动式讲座:一项随机试验
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jul 27;7:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-25.
6
A curious case of the phantom professor: mindless teaching evaluations by medical students.“幽灵教授”的离奇案例:医学生毫无意义的教学评价
Med Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):928-32. doi: 10.1111/medu.12647.
7
The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program.讲座出勤和其他变量对医学生如何评估临床前课程教师的影响。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):972-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294e99a.
8
Effect of immediate student evaluations on a multi-instructor course.即时学生评价对多教师授课课程的影响。
J Med Educ. 1983 Mar;58(3):172-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198303000-00002.
9
The influence of student interest on teaching evaluation.
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;6(2):141-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02598312.
10
On the lighter side: Medicine or etiquette? Rethinking a lecturer's teaching assignment.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2019 Aug;22(6):430. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2018.1526223. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey of Residents' Attitudes and Awareness Toward Teaching and Student Feedback.住院医师对教学及学生反馈的态度与认知调查
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Dec;6(4):698-703. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00221.1.
2
Lectures based on cardinal symptoms in undergraduate medicine - effects of evaluation-based interventions on teaching large groups.本科医学中基于主要症状的讲座——基于评估的干预措施对大班教学的影响。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011;28(1):Doc15. doi: 10.3205/zma000727. Epub 2011 Jan 4.