Wang Zongqin, Feng Yingying, Wang Yanyan, Qiu Hui, Rui Zhongyang, Li Mingxing, Lv Lihua
Wuhan Mental Health Center, No. 93 Youyi Road Qiaokou District, China.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 11;2022:5046761. doi: 10.1155/2022/5046761. eCollection 2022.
To systematically assess the safety and efficacy of olanzapine versus clozapine when treating senile dementia and to provide evidence-based medicine basis for its promotion and use.
PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network Database (CNKI), China VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) online database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of olanzapine and clozapine when treating senile dementia. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the database to the present. The data were extracted independently by two researchers, and the bias risk of each contained literature was analyzed in accordance with the standard of Cochrane Handbook 5.3. RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used to analyze the collected data by meta-analysis.
Finally, 6 randomized controlled trial articles were included, with a total of 490 samples. Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy showed that the clinical efficacy was similar and there was no significant difference ( > 0.05). Two articles used Alzheimer's disease pathological behavior rating scale (BEHAVE-AD) to compare the pathological behavior of different stages after treatment. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the total score of BEHAVE-AD and the scores of each factor in each week after treatment. The non-treatment adverse reaction scale (TESS) of the study group and the control group was analyzed by meta-analysis. The TESS score of the study group after treatment was significantly lower than that of the control group. The BPRS scores of different stages after treatment were analyzed by meta-analysis, and there was no significant difference in the total score and factor scores of BPRS in each week after treatment. Two clinical trials reported the incidence of neurological symptoms after treatment. Olanzapine and clozapine treatment can effectively reduce the risk of aging. There was no significant difference in the incidence of neurological symptoms in patients with dementia ( > 0.05). According to the analysis of meat products, the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( < 0.05).
Olanzapine and clozapine have similar efficacy when treating mental and behavioral disorders in patients with senile dementia, in which olanzapine is more effective in improving the symptoms of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), with less adverse reactions and high safety, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice. However, more studies and follow-up with higher methodological quality and longer intervention time are needed to further verify.
系统评价奥氮平与氯氮平治疗老年痴呆的安全性和有效性,为其推广应用提供循证医学依据。
检索PubMed、Embase、ScienceDirect、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网数据库(CNKI)、中国维普数据库、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)等在线数据库中奥氮平和氯氮平治疗老年痴呆的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索时限为各数据库建库至目前。由两名研究人员独立提取数据,并按照Cochrane手册5.3标准对各纳入文献的偏倚风险进行分析。采用RevMan 5.4统计软件对收集的数据进行Meta分析。
最终纳入6篇随机对照试验文章,共490例样本。临床疗效Meta分析显示,两者临床疗效相似,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。2篇文章采用阿尔茨海默病病理行为评定量表(BEHAVE-AD)比较治疗后不同阶段的病理行为。统计分析显示,治疗后各周BEHAVE-AD总分及各因子得分差异无统计学意义。对研究组和对照组的非治疗不良反应量表(TESS)进行Meta分析。研究组治疗后的TESS评分显著低于对照组。对治疗后不同阶段的BPRS评分进行Meta分析,治疗后各周BPRS总分及因子分差异无统计学意义。两项临床试验报告了治疗后神经症状的发生率。奥氮平和氯氮平治疗均可有效降低衰老风险。痴呆患者神经症状发生率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。根据肉类制品分析,研究组不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(<0.05)。
奥氮平和氯氮平治疗老年痴呆患者精神行为障碍疗效相似,其中奥氮平对改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者症状更有效,不良反应少,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。但仍需更多方法学质量更高、干预时间更长的研究及随访进一步验证。