Lee Esther, Elzomor Amir, Boulos Sameh, Silva Olivia, Pasick Luke J, Benito Daniel A, Tong Jane, Zapanta Philip, Joshi Arjun S, Goodman Joseph F, Thakkar Punam G
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia.
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 May 19;35(5):615-620. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2075686. eCollection 2022.
The pulse-electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) is an electrosurgical technology that is widely used in surgery. Our study aimed to summarize device malfunctions, patient injuries, and interventions related to PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0. The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for reports of PlasmaBlade adverse events from June 6, 2010, to August 30, 2020. Data were extracted from reports pertaining to PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 384 medical device reports were identified, from which 424 adverse events were extracted. Of those, 348 (82.1%) were device malfunctions, 53 (12.5%) were patient injuries, and 23 (5.4%) were operator injuries. Device malfunctions were most frequently caused by delaminated coating (110, 25.9%), followed by ignition or fire (56, 13.2%). Operator injury was most frequently caused by thermal injury (19, 4.5%), followed by laceration (4, 0.9%). Pacemakers (22, 57.9%) were the most common devices causing interference. PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0 have demonstrated utility during surgeries but are associated with adverse events. Interventions that aim to educate physicians on potential risks may help reduce the incidence of complications. Future studies with standardized reporting protocols are warranted.
脉冲电子雪崩刀(PEAK)PlasmaBlade 3.0和4.0(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)是一种广泛应用于外科手术的电外科技术。我们的研究旨在总结与PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0和4.0相关的设备故障、患者损伤及干预措施。查询了美国食品药品监督管理局的制造商和用户设施设备经验(MAUDE)数据库,以获取2010年6月6日至2020年8月30日期间PlasmaBlade不良事件的报告。从与PlasmaBlade 3.0和4.0相关的报告中提取数据。共识别出384份医疗器械报告,从中提取了424起不良事件。其中,348起(82.1%)为设备故障,53起(12.5%)为患者损伤,23起(5.4%)为操作人员损伤。设备故障最常见的原因是涂层分层(110起,25.9%),其次是点火或起火(56起,13.2%)。操作人员损伤最常见的原因是热损伤(19起,4.5%),其次是撕裂伤(4起,0.9%)。起搏器(22起,57.9%)是引起干扰的最常见设备。PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0和4.0在手术中已显示出效用,但与不良事件相关。旨在对医生进行潜在风险教育的干预措施可能有助于降低并发症的发生率。有必要开展采用标准化报告方案的未来研究。