Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Research Development Unit, Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep 1;60(3):109-116. doi: 10.6859/aja.202209_60(3).0003. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
The quality of postanesthesia recovery is among the important issues of general anesthesia that affect the patient's ability to perform daily activities. This study hence aimed to investigate the effects of general anesthesia with isoflurane and propofol on the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing an abdominal hysterectomy.
This clinical trial was conducted on 80 women aged 30-65 years who visited Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital of Babol for an elective abdominal hysterectomy in 2020. Based on a randomized block design (4 blocks of 20), the participants were equally assigned to two groups of propofol (P) and isoflurane (I). The QoR-15 scale was employed to measure the QoR in terms of physical and mental dimensions, as primary outcomes, and duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, response time, quality of extubation, changes in blood pressure and heart rate, length of stay in the recovery unit, Aldrete score, pain score, and prevalence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), as secondary outcomes.
The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative physical and mental changes (P = 0.142), except for the second night after surgery (P = 0.001). The QoR, both physically and mentally, significantly changed in both groups over time (P < 0.05). The results also indicated that response time (P < 0.001), quality of extubation (P = 0.01), prevalence of PONV (P = 0.001), and increase in blood pressure (P = 0.02) were significantly lower in the propofol group (P) than in the isoflurane group (I). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of stay in the recovery unit (P = 0.44), pre-discharge Aldrete score (P = 0.31), pain score (P = 0.18), duration of anesthesia (P = 0.30), duration of surgery (P = 0.64), and heart rate (P = 0.30).
Propofol outperformed isoflurane in terms of response time, quality of extubation, prevalence of PONV, and increase in blood pressure. In addition, the physical and mental QoR on the second night after surgery was higher in patients anesthetized with propofol compared to those anesthetized with isoflurane.
麻醉后恢复质量是全身麻醉的重要问题之一,影响患者进行日常活动的能力。本研究旨在调查全身麻醉中使用异氟醚和丙泊酚对行腹部子宫切除术患者恢复质量(QoR)的影响。
本临床试验于 2020 年在阿亚图拉鲁哈尼医院对 80 名年龄在 30-65 岁之间的女性进行,这些女性均为择期行腹部子宫切除术。根据随机区组设计(4 个 20 例),将参与者等分为丙泊酚(P)和异氟醚(I)两组。采用 QoR-15 量表测量身体和精神维度的 QoR,作为主要结局,以及麻醉持续时间、手术持续时间、反应时间、拔管质量、血压和心率变化、恢复单元停留时间、Aldrete 评分、疼痛评分和术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率,作为次要结局。
结果显示,两组患者术后身体和精神变化无显著差异(P = 0.142),除术后第二晚(P = 0.001)外。两组患者的 QoR 在身体和精神上均随时间发生显著变化(P < 0.05)。结果还表明,反应时间(P < 0.001)、拔管质量(P = 0.01)、PONV 发生率(P = 0.001)和血压升高(P = 0.02)在丙泊酚组(P)显著低于异氟醚组(I)。两组患者在恢复单元停留时间(P = 0.44)、出院前 Aldrete 评分(P = 0.31)、疼痛评分(P = 0.18)、麻醉持续时间(P = 0.30)、手术持续时间(P = 0.64)和心率(P = 0.30)方面无显著差异。
丙泊酚在反应时间、拔管质量、PONV 发生率和血压升高方面优于异氟醚。此外,与异氟醚麻醉相比,丙泊酚麻醉的患者在术后第二晚的身体和精神 QoR 更高。