Bjørlykke Kristin H, Jahnsen Jørgen, Brynskov Jørn, Molander Pauliina, Eberhardson Michael, Davidsdottir Loà G, Sipponen Taina, Hjortswang Henrik, Goll Guro Løvik, Syversen Silje Watterdal, Langholz Ebbe, Jørgensen Kristin K, Steenholdt Casper
Department of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan;58(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2108684. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia.
A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies.
In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway ( < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week ( = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%.
TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.
治疗药物监测(TDM)可能会优化炎症性肠病(IBD)的生物制剂和硫唑嘌呤治疗。本研究旨在调查斯堪的纳维亚地区TDM的实施和应用情况。
通过各国学会向斯堪的纳维亚地区的胃肠病学家发放一份关于TDM使用情况的网络调查问卷。
共有297名开具生物制剂治疗的IBD医生参与,社区医院和大学医院的医生人数分布均衡(回复率42%)(挪威118名(40%),丹麦86名(29%),瑞典50名(17%),芬兰33名(11%),冰岛10名(3%))。总体而言,87%的患者在生物制剂治疗期间应用了TDM,而肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNF)的应用率>90%。在使用者中,反应性TDM和前瞻性TDM的使用率分别为90%和63%。与其他斯堪的纳维亚国家相比,丹麦医生使用TDM的倾向明显较低(58%对98%);比值比(OR)为0.03[0.01 - 0.09],P<0.001)。反应性TDM通常在初次(74%)和二次(99%)治疗失败时应用。前瞻性TDM在维持治疗期间的使用率为8%,在诱导治疗期间为56%,在挪威更常用(P<0.001),每周管理超过10例IBD患者的医生使用该方法的比例更高(P = 0.005)。TDM方案是根据现有证据进行解读的,但前瞻性TDM存在差异。TDM的主要障碍是缺乏指南(51%)以及采样与结果之间的时间延迟(49%)。87%的医生常规使用硫唑嘌呤的TDM。
生物制剂和硫唑嘌呤治疗的TDM已在斯堪的纳维亚地区广泛应用于临床实践。然而,医生们呼吁制定TDM指南,详细说明检测结果的适应症和解读方法,并缩短检测反应时间。