• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病、炎症性关节炎和银屑病患者生物药物的前瞻性治疗药物监测:系统评价和荟萃分析

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zeraatkar Dena, Pitre Tyler Stacy, Kirsh Sarah, Jassal Tanvir, Ling Michael, Hussain Muizz, Couban Rachel J, Kawano-Dourado Leticia, Kristianslund Eirik K, Olav Vandvik Per

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Med. 2024 Oct 28;3(1):e000998. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000998. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000998
PMID:39574425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11579540/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To address the efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Central, and CINAHL, from database inception to 23 May 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Trials including people with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis were selected. Selected trials also randomly assigned people to either proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors or other biologic drugs in the intervention group, and to either no therapeutic drug monitoring or standard care in the control group. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen search records and collect data from eligible trials. For each outcome, a frequentist, pairwise, random effects meta-analysis was done and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations).

RESULTS

Of 10 eligible trials identified, reporting on 2383 patients, two investigated induction with infliximab (533 patients), four assessed maintenance with infliximab (901 patients), and three assessed maintenance with adalimumab (710 patients). One trial was of maintenance with infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept (239 patients). For patients who had induction with infliximab, the effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring on remission and adverse events were uncertain. Low certainty evidence suggested that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring may have little or no effect on disease activity, physical function, mental health, and quality of life. For patients who had maintenance with infliximab, low certainty evidence suggested that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring may increase the proportion of patients who had sustained disease control or remission (relative risk 1.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.40), absolute risk difference of 146 more per 1000 patients treated for one year (95% CI 78 to 224). Additionally, this treatment and monitoring may reduce disease worsening, and may have little or no effect on disease activity, physical function, mental health, and quality of life. The effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab on adverse events and formation of anti-drug antibodies were uncertain. For patients who had maintenance with adalimumab, the effects of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring were uncertain.

CONCLUSION

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab during maintenance may help patients to have sustained disease control or remission. No compelling evidence supported the effectiveness of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab during induction or proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab during maintenance.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/x4m28/.

摘要

目的

探讨对炎症性肠病、炎症性关节炎和银屑病患者进行生物药物主动治疗药物监测的疗效和安全性。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

Medline、Embase、Central和CINAHL,从数据库建立至2024年5月23日。

研究选择的纳入标准

选择纳入炎症性肠病、炎症性关节炎和银屑病患者的试验。入选试验还将患者随机分为干预组,接受肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂或其他生物药物的主动治疗药物监测,对照组接受无治疗药物监测或标准治疗。评审员独立且重复地筛选检索记录,并从符合条件的试验中收集数据。对于每个结局,进行了频率学派、成对、随机效应荟萃分析,并使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)评估证据的确定性。

结果

在确定的10项符合条件的试验中,共报告了2383例患者,其中两项研究英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗(533例患者),四项评估英夫利昔单抗维持治疗(901例患者),三项评估阿达木单抗维持治疗(710例患者)。一项试验为英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和依那西普的维持治疗(239例患者)。对于接受英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗的患者,主动治疗药物监测对缓解和不良事件的影响尚不确定。低确定性证据表明,主动治疗药物监测对疾病活动、身体功能、心理健康和生活质量可能几乎没有影响。对于接受英夫利昔单抗维持治疗的患者,低确定性证据表明,主动治疗药物监测可能会增加疾病持续得到控制或缓解的患者比例(相对风险1.26(95%置信区间(CI)1.14至1.40),每1000例接受治疗一年的患者中,绝对风险差异多146例(95%CI 78至224)。此外,这种治疗和监测可能会减少疾病恶化,对疾病活动、身体功能、心理健康和生活质量可能几乎没有影响。英夫利昔单抗主动治疗药物监测对不良事件和抗药物抗体形成的影响尚不确定。对于接受阿达木单抗维持治疗的患者,主动治疗药物监测的效果尚不确定。

结论

英夫利昔单抗维持治疗期间的主动治疗药物监测可能有助于患者持续控制疾病或实现缓解。没有令人信服的证据支持英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗期间主动治疗药物监测的有效性,或阿达木单抗维持治疗期间主动治疗药物监测的有效性。

系统评价注册

https://osf.io/x4m28/ 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/dcf0cce15aa5/bmjmed-3-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/2e39a679ba3e/bmjmed-3-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/d2086fa8baab/bmjmed-3-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/dcf0cce15aa5/bmjmed-3-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/2e39a679ba3e/bmjmed-3-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/d2086fa8baab/bmjmed-3-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f5/11579540/dcf0cce15aa5/bmjmed-3-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis: systematic review and meta-analysis.炎症性肠病、炎症性关节炎和银屑病患者生物药物的前瞻性治疗药物监测:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Med. 2024 Oct 28;3(1):e000998. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000998. eCollection 2024.
2
Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, or psoriasis: a clinical practice guideline.生物药物在炎症性肠病、炎症性关节炎或银屑病成人患者中的主动治疗药物监测:临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 28;387:e079830. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079830.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
7
TNF-alpha inhibitors for ankylosing spondylitis.用于强直性脊柱炎的肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 18;2015(4):CD005468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005468.pub2.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, for Crohn's disease.TNF-α 抑制剂(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)治疗克罗恩病的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(6):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta15060.
9
Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(10):i-xxi, 1-329. doi: 10.3310/hta15100.
10
Effect of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring vs Standard Therapy During Maintenance Infliximab Therapy on Disease Control in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者维持 infliximab 治疗中治疗药物监测与标准治疗对疾病控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 21;326(23):2375-2384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21316.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical consequences of infliximab immunogenicity and the effect of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring: exploratory analyses of the randomised, controlled NOR-DRUM trials.英夫利昔单抗免疫原性的临床后果及主动治疗药物监测的影响:对随机对照 NOR-DRUM 试验的探索性分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Apr;6(4):e226-e236. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00341-7. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Proactive Infliximab Monitoring Improves the Rates of Transmural Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.前瞻性英夫利昔单抗监测可提高克罗恩病的黏膜愈合率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Nov 4;30(11):1974-1982. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad272.
3
Global, regional, and national incidence of six major immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019.
六种主要免疫介导性炎症疾病的全球、区域和国家发病率:全球疾病负担研究2019的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Sep 9;64:102193. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102193. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Meta-analysis: The efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-TNF-therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.Meta 分析:抗 TNF 治疗炎症性肠病的治疗药物监测的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;57(12):1362-1374. doi: 10.1111/apt.17313. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Reduced prescription of TNF-inhibitors in chronic arthritis based on therapeutic drug monitoring: A randomized controlled trial.基于治疗药物监测的慢性关节炎 TNF 抑制剂减少处方:一项随机对照试验。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Sep;52(5):468-480. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2121081. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine.评估炎症性关节疾病中生物药物的免疫原性:迈向个体化医学的进展。
BioDrugs. 2022 Nov;36(6):731-748. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00559-1. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia.炎症性肠病的治疗药物监测:斯堪的纳维亚半岛临床实践中的实施、应用及障碍
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan;58(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2108684. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach.GRADE指南34:使用最低限度情境化方法对不精确性进行评级的更新。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Versus Conventional Management for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.主动治疗药物监测与炎症性肠病的常规管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Oct;163(4):937-949.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.052. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.炎症性肠病中抗TNF治疗药物监测的成本效益:一项系统评价
Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 7;14(5):1009. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051009.