Suppr超能文献

个人智慧在人们关于个性的复杂叙述中显而易见。

Personal Intelligence Is Evident in the Sophistication of People's Narratives about Personality.

作者信息

Allen Jayne L, Mayer John D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2022 Aug 10;10(3):56. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030056.

Abstract

Personal intelligence concerns the ability to understand personality in oneself and others-including the understanding of motives, socioemotional traits, and abilities. We examined if people's scores on the ability-based would be reflected in their narratives about someone whose personality they had learned about. In a Preliminary Study ( = 220), we collected narratives and open-ended descriptions about their learning. In Study 1 ( = 212), experts rated the respondents' open-ended narratives for their sophistication about personality, defined as their knowledge and complexity of thought around the topic. Respondents also filled out checklists concerning what they learned and their relationship outcomes. Study 2 ( = 299) was a replication and extension in which we added the TOPI. Participants who scored higher on the TOPI produced narratives higher in Sophistication, even after statistical controls for Word Count and Vocabulary (the measures also were largely independent of the Big Five). The findings here may have applications for both testing and training.

摘要

个人智力涉及理解自身和他人个性的能力,包括对动机、社会情感特征和能力的理解。我们研究了人们在基于能力的[此处原文缺失相关内容]上的得分是否会在他们关于了解到其个性的某人的叙述中得到体现。在一项初步研究(N = 220)中,我们收集了关于他们学习情况的叙述和开放式描述。在研究1(N = 212)中,专家根据受访者开放式叙述中关于个性的成熟度对其进行评分,个性成熟度定义为他们围绕该主题的知识和思维复杂性。受访者还填写了关于他们学到了什么以及他们的关系结果的清单。研究2(N = 299)是一项重复和扩展研究,我们在其中加入了TOPI。即使在对单词数量和词汇进行统计控制之后(这些指标在很大程度上也与大五人格无关),在TOPI上得分较高的参与者所产生的叙述在成熟度方面也更高。这里的研究结果可能在测试和培训方面都有应用。

相似文献

1
Personal Intelligence Is Evident in the Sophistication of People's Narratives about Personality.
J Intell. 2022 Aug 10;10(3):56. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030056.
3
Does personal intelligence exist? Evidence from a new ability-based measure.
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):124-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.646108.
4
Employees High in Personal Intelligence Differ From Their Colleagues in Workplace Perceptions and Behavior.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):539-550. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1455690. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Better Open Than Intellectual: The Benefits of Investment Personality Traits for Learning.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):562-573. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744526. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Big Five Personality Traits and Gratitude: The Role of Emotional Intelligence.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Nov 11;13:977-988. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S268643. eCollection 2020.
7
When people estimate their personal intelligence who is overconfident? Who is accurate?
J Pers. 2020 Dec;88(6):1129-1144. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12561. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Predicting personality or prejudice? Facial inference in the age of artificial intelligence.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Aug;58:101815. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101815. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Autistic Narratives of Sensory Features, Sexuality, and Relationships.
Autism Adulthood. 2021 Sep 1;3(3):238-246. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0049. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

2
A meta-analysis of the relationship between emotion recognition ability and intelligence.
Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):329-351. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1632801. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Employees High in Personal Intelligence Differ From Their Colleagues in Workplace Perceptions and Behavior.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):539-550. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1455690. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
How Can Evolutionary Psychology Successfully Explain Personality and Individual Differences?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01138.x.
6
Causality in thought.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:223-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
8
Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability.
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806327. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):841-69. doi: 10.1037/a0030746. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial.
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验