Suppr超能文献

复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合预防性使用Impella CP心室辅助装置

Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Prophylactic Use of the Impella CP Ventricular Assist Device.

作者信息

van den Buijs Deborah M F, van den Brink Floris S, Wilgenhof Adriaan, Zivelonghi Carlo, Verouden Niels, Knaapen Paul, Sjauw Krischan D, Vermeersch Paul, Nap Alex

机构信息

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, 2333ZA, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Sep;34(9):E665-E671. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00031. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with complex coronary artery disease, concomitant cardiac disease, and multiple comorbidities are addressed as complex higher-risk indicated patients (CHIPs). Selecting a revascularization strategy in this population remains challenging. If coronary artery bypass grafting is deemed high risk or patients are considered inoperable, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the support of the Impella CP ventricular assist device (Abiomed) may be an attractive alternative.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we included consecutive patients undergoing Impella CP-facilitated complex high-risk PCI. All patients were discussed by the heart team and were declined for surgery. Additionally, periprocedural mechanical circulatory support was deemed necessary. We collected demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and mortality rates up to 30 days were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (median age, 73 ± 9.7 years; 74.1% men) were included in our study. The median SYNTAX score was 32 (range, 8-57) and EuroSCORE was 7.25% (range, 1.33-49.66; ± 12.76%). Periprocedural hemodynamic instability was observed in 1 patient (3.7%). In-hospital combined with 30-day mortality was 7.4% (2/27). No repeat revascularization was necessary. MACE was observed in 10 patients (37.0%). Six patients (22.2%) had a major bleeding complication, of which 2 were related to Impella access site. Median Impella run time was 1.22 hours and there was no significant decrease in kidney function. Median admission time after PCI was 3 days (range, 1-23; ± 4.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The Impella CP system showed good feasibility and provided adequate hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI in this CHIP population.

摘要

目的

患有复杂冠状动脉疾病、合并心脏病及多种共病的患者被视为复杂高危指征患者(CHIPs)。为这一人群选择血运重建策略仍然具有挑战性。如果冠状动脉旁路移植术被认为风险很高或患者被认为无法进行手术,在Impella CP心室辅助装置(Abiomed)支持下的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)可能是一个有吸引力的替代方案。

方法

在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们纳入了连续接受Impella CP辅助的复杂高危PCI的患者。所有患者均由心脏团队进行讨论,且被拒绝手术。此外,围手术期机械循环支持被认为是必要的。我们收集了人口统计学、临床和手术特征。评估了30天内的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和死亡率。

结果

我们的研究共纳入27例患者(中位年龄73±9.7岁;74.1%为男性)。中位SYNTAX评分为32(范围8 - 57),欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)为7.25%(范围1.33 - 49.66;±12.76%)。1例患者(3.7%)出现围手术期血流动力学不稳定。住院期间及30天死亡率为7.4%(2/27)。无需再次血运重建。10例患者(37.0%)发生MACE。6例患者(22.2%)出现严重出血并发症,其中2例与Impella置入部位有关。Impella中位运行时间为1.22小时,肾功能无显著下降。PCI术后中位住院时间为3天(范围1 - 23;±4.76)。

结论

在这一CHIP人群的高危PCI过程中,Impella CP系统显示出良好的可行性,并提供了足够的血流动力学支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验