• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Risk scores: Tools with limitations that do not replace clinical judgment but only complement it.

作者信息

Carosella Victorio C

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Instituto Cardiovascular San Isidro, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 21;8:505. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.024. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.024
PMID:36004072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390527/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Risk scores: Tools with limitations that do not replace clinical judgment but only complement it.风险评分：这些工具存在局限性，不能取代临床判断，而只是对其起到补充作用。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 21;8:505. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.024. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: risk scores and clinical judgment in predicting outcomes of UGIB.上消化道出血：风险评分与临床判断对预测 UGIB 结局的价值。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;11(7):399-401. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.98. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
3
Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis.晕厥风险分层工具与临床判断：一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2014 Nov;127(11):1126.e13-1126.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 May 23.
4
High-Fidelity Simulation and Clinical Judgment of Nursing Students in a Maternal-Newborn Course.高保真模拟与护理学生在母婴课程中的临床判断。
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;42(10):829-837. doi: 10.1177/0193945920907395. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Clinical guidance is not designed to replace professional judgment.临床指南并非旨在取代专业判断。
BMJ. 2014 Jan 29;348:g1106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1106.
6
A comparison of the CARG tool, the VES-13, and oncologist judgment in predicting grade 3+ toxicities in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer.在预测接受化疗的转移性前列腺癌男性患者发生3级及以上毒性反应方面，对CARG工具、VES-13和肿瘤学家的判断进行比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Jan;8(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
7
Evaluation of Validity Evidence for Personality, Emotional Intelligence, and Situational Judgment Tests to Identify Successful Residents.评估人格、情绪智力和情境判断测验在识别成功住院医师方面的有效性证据。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):409-416. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5013.
8
In this issue: Time to replace doctors' judgement with computers.
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Nov 16;22(3):3 p preceding 316. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i3.839.
9
Valuing structured professional judgment: predictive validity, decision-making, and the clinical-actuarial conflict.重视结构化专业判断：预测效度、决策制定以及临床-计量的冲突。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Jan-Feb;31(1):40-54. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2043. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Clinical judgment versus geriatric assessment for frailty in older patients with cancer.临床判断与老年综合评估在老年癌症患者虚弱中的应用比较。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(7):1138-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply from authors: Objective nutritional index as a simple and effective tool for the assessment of mortality risk after cardiac surgery.作者回复：客观营养指数作为评估心脏手术后死亡风险的一种简单有效的工具。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Oct 23;8:508. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.10.023. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Reply: Prediction remains difficult-in particular when it involves the future!回复：预测仍然困难，尤其是当它涉及未来的时候！
JTCVS Open. 2021 Oct 13;8:506. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.10.002. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Reply: The tools of our trade.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of preoperative nutritional scores on 1-year postoperative mortality in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery.术前营养评分对瓣膜心脏病手术患者 1 年术后死亡率的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Oct;164(4):1140-1149.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.099. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Commentary: Appropriate frailty measures should be incorporated into the development of accurate risk calculation models for evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement candidates.评论：在开发用于评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术候选者的准确风险计算模型时，应纳入适当的衰弱测量方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;161(6):2103-2104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.107. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
回复：我们这一行的工具。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 26;8:507. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.035. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.
老年主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱：FRAILTY-AVR 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
Gait Speed and Operative Mortality in Older Adults Following Cardiac Surgery.老年人心脏手术后的步态速度与手术死亡率。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;1(3):314-21. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0316.
5
Cardiac surgery risk modeling for mortality: a review of current practice and suggestions for improvement.心脏手术死亡率风险建模：当前实践综述与改进建议
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jun;77(6):2232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.032.