Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):603-612. doi: 10.1177/15459683221119757. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without freezing of Gait (FoG) may respond differently to exercise interventions for several reasons, including disease duration. This study aimed to determine whether both people with and without FoG benefit from the Agility Boot Camp with Cognitive Challenges (ABC-C) program.
This secondary analysis of our ABC-C trial included 86 PD subjects: 44 without FoG (PD-FoG) and 42 with FoG (PD + FoG). We collected measures of standing sway balance, anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, and a 2-minute walk with and without a cognitive task. Two-way repeated analysis of variance, with disease duration as covariate, was used to investigate the effects of ABC-C program. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized response mean (SRM) for PD-FoG and PD + FoG, separately.
The ABC-C program was effective in improving gait performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG, even after controlling for disease duration. Specifically, dual-task gait speed ( < .0001), dual-cost stride length ( = .012), and these single-task measures: arm range of motion ( < .0001), toe-off angle ( = .005), gait cycle duration variability ( = .019), trunk coronal range of motion ( = .042), and stance time ( = .046) improved in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG. There was no interaction effect between time (before and after exercise) and group (PD-FoG/PD + FoG) in all 24 objective measures of balance and gait. Dual-task gait speed improved the most in PD + FoG (SRM = 1.01), whereas single-task arm range of motion improved the most in PD-FoG (SRM = 1.01).
The ABC-C program was similarly effective in improving gait (and not balance) performance in both PD-FoG and PD + FoG.
患有帕金森病(PD)且伴有或不伴有步态冻结(FoG)的个体可能由于多种原因,包括疾病持续时间,对运动干预的反应不同。本研究旨在确定患有 FoG 和不伴有 FoG 的 PD 患者是否均能从敏捷训练营结合认知挑战(ABC-C)方案中受益。
这是我们的 ABC-C 试验的二次分析,纳入了 86 例 PD 患者:44 例无 FoG(PD-FoG)和 42 例有 FoG(PD+FoG)。我们收集了站立摇摆平衡、姿势预位调整、姿势反应以及有无认知任务的 2 分钟步行的测量值。采用双向重复方差分析,以疾病持续时间为协变量,来研究 ABC-C 方案的效果。使用 PD-FoG 和 PD+FoG 的标准化反应均值(SRM)分别计算效应大小。
即使在控制疾病持续时间的情况下,ABC-C 方案也能有效改善 PD-FoG 和 PD+FoG 的步态表现。具体来说,双重任务步态速度( < .0001)、双重成本步长( = .012)以及这些单任务指标:手臂活动范围( < .0001)、离地角度( = .005)、步态周期持续时间变异性( = .019)、躯干冠状活动范围( = .042)和站立时间( = .046)在 PD-FoG 和 PD+FoG 中均得到改善。在平衡和步态的所有 24 项客观测量中,时间(运动前后)和组(PD-FoG/PD+FoG)之间没有交互作用。在 PD+FoG 中,双重任务步态速度改善最多(SRM = 1.01),而在 PD-FoG 中,单任务手臂活动范围改善最多(SRM = 1.01)。
ABC-C 方案在改善 PD-FoG 和 PD+FoG 的步态(而非平衡)表现方面同样有效。