Helwig H, Wooge K
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902). 1978 Oct;126(10):583-7.
Diagnostic procedures were evaluated in a prospective study including 1099 unselected children seen at a children's hospital. The predominant importance of a detailed case history (88,3%) and of the clinical examination could be demonstrated. On the other hand, apparative routine examinations were of very limited value, mostly to exclude particular diagnoses. The efficiency of apparative diagnostic procedures could be improved by allowing for a more differentiated indication of their use.
在一项前瞻性研究中，对1099名在儿童医院就诊的未经过筛选的儿童进行了诊断程序评估。结果表明，详细的病史（88.3%）和临床检查具有最重要的意义。另一方面，常规仪器检查的价值非常有限，主要用于排除特定诊断。通过更有针对性地使用仪器诊断程序，可以提高其效率。
