Stríbrnský Branislav, Hinca Róbert, Farkas Gabriel, Petriska Martin, Slugeň Vladimír
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Nuclear and Physical Engineering, Ilkovičova 3, 812 19 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2022 Aug 22;198(9-11):704-711. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncac123.
For precise modeling of a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector, detailed knowledge of its geometry is necessary. Unfortunately, some of the detector geometric parameters are often not available. This study suggests simple procedures for determining geometry without the need for radiography. The study considers the HPGe detector GC0518 manufactured by Mirion. The detector datasheet is available, but the uncertainties do not allow the detector to be modeled without additional corrections. The detector was modeled using MCNP5 code and the results were compared with calibration point sources and Marinelli beakers measurements. We also performed measurements to obtain information on the germanium dead layer, crystal holder shape, inner hole shape and radii of the crystal edges. Then the model was optimized according to the measurements. Finally, the full energy peak efficiencies were evaluated. The relative differences between the measured and calculated efficiencies are less than 4.5% for point sources and 5.4% for Marinelli beakers.
为了对高纯锗(HPGe)探测器进行精确建模,必须详细了解其几何形状。不幸的是,一些探测器的几何参数往往无法获取。本研究提出了无需射线照相即可确定几何形状的简单程序。该研究考虑了由Mirion制造的HPGe探测器GC0518。探测器的数据手册是可用的,但由于存在不确定性,若不进行额外校正则无法对探测器进行建模。使用MCNP5代码对探测器进行建模,并将结果与校准点源和马林内利烧杯测量结果进行比较。我们还进行了测量,以获取有关锗死层、晶体支架形状、内孔形状和晶体边缘半径的信息。然后根据测量结果对模型进行优化。最后,评估了全能峰效率。对于点源,测量效率与计算效率之间的相对差异小于4.5%;对于马林内利烧杯,该相对差异小于5.4%。