• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经胸与经食管裂孔食管切除术的长期生存:芬兰基于人群的全国性研究。

Long-Term Survival After Transhiatal Versus Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8158-8167. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12349-8. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-12349-8
PMID:36006492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9640399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No population-based studies comparing long-term survival after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) and transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) exist. This study aimed to compare the 5-year survival of esophageal cancer patients undergoing THE or TTE in a population-based nationwide setting.

METHODS

This study included all curatively intended THE and TTE for esophageal cancer in Finland during 1987-2016, with follow-up evaluation until 31 December 2019. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 5-year and 90-day mortality. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, histology, neoadjuvant treatment, and pathologic stage.

RESULTS

A total of 1338 patients underwent THE (n = 323) or TTE (n = 1015). The observed 5-year survival rate was 39.3% after THE and 45.0% after TTE (p = 0.072). In adjusted model 1, THE was not associated with greater 5-year mortality (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.82-1.20) than TTE. In adjusted model 2, including T stage instead of pathologic stage, the 5-year mortality hazard rates after THE (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.05) and TTE were comparable. The 90-day mortality rate for THE was higher than for TTE (adjusted HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.45-1.14). In subgroup analyses, no differences between THE and TTE were observed in Siewert II gastroesophageal junction cancers, esophageal cancers, or pN0 tumors, nor in the comparison of THE and TTE with two-field lymphadenectomy. The sensitivity analysis, including patients with missing patient records, who underwent surgery during 1996-2016 mirrored the main analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This Finnish population-based nationwide study suggests no difference in 5-year or 90-day mortality after THE and TTE for esophageal cancer.

摘要

背景

目前尚无基于人群的研究比较经胸食管切除术(TTE)和经食管裂孔食管切除术(THE)后长期生存情况。本研究旨在比较在基于人群的全国范围内,接受 THE 或 TTE 的食管癌患者的 5 年生存率。

方法

本研究纳入了 1987 年至 2016 年间在芬兰接受根治性 THE 和 TTE 治疗的所有食管癌患者,随访至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。Cox 比例风险模型提供了 5 年和 90 天死亡率的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。结果调整了年龄、性别、手术年份、合并症、组织学、新辅助治疗和病理分期。

结果

共 1338 例患者接受了 THE(n=323)或 TTE(n=1015)。THE 组和 TTE 组的观察 5 年生存率分别为 39.3%和 45.0%(p=0.072)。在调整后的模型 1 中,THE 与 5 年死亡率无显著相关性(HR 0.99;95%CI 0.82-1.20)。在调整后的模型 2 中,包括 T 分期而不是病理分期,THE 组和 TTE 组的 5 年死亡率风险比(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.72-1.05)相似。THE 组的 90 天死亡率高于 TTE 组(调整后的 HR 0.72;95%CI 0.45-1.14)。在亚组分析中,THE 组和 TTE 组在 Siewert II 胃食管交界处癌、食管癌或 pN0 肿瘤以及两种淋巴结清扫术的比较中,均未观察到差异。包括缺失患者记录的患者的敏感性分析,其手术时间为 1996-2016 年,与主要分析结果一致。

结论

本项基于芬兰人群的全国性研究表明,食管癌患者接受 THE 和 TTE 治疗后,5 年或 90 天死亡率无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/24d80b9103a6/10434_2022_12349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/84fda9eea252/10434_2022_12349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/5487b419df07/10434_2022_12349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/24d80b9103a6/10434_2022_12349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/84fda9eea252/10434_2022_12349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/5487b419df07/10434_2022_12349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4155/9640399/24d80b9103a6/10434_2022_12349_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Survival After Transhiatal Versus Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland.经胸与经食管裂孔食管切除术的长期生存:芬兰基于人群的全国性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8158-8167. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12349-8. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Five-year Survival after McKeown Compared to Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-based Nationwide Study in Finland.麦克科恩手术与经胸食管切除术治疗食管癌的 5 年生存率比较:芬兰基于人群的全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):964-970. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005437. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Preoperative Esophageal Stenting and 5-Year Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Population-Based Nationwide Study from Finland.术前食管支架置入与食管癌患者食管切除术 5 年生存率:来自芬兰的一项基于人群的全国性研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1078-1088. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05643-7. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
4
Transthoracic esophagectomy compared to transhiatal extended gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.经胸食管切除术与经食管裂孔扩大胃切除术治疗食管胃交界腺癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab090.
5
Long-Term Quality of Life Following Transthoracic and Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.胸、经食管裂孔食管癌根治术后的长期生活质量。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jul;25(7):1657-1666. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04783-4. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
[Survival comparison of Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction between transthoracic and transabdominal approaches:a joint data analysis of thoracic and gastrointestinal surgery].[经胸与经腹入路治疗食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌的生存比较:胸外科与胃肠外科联合数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):132-142.
7
Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.经裂孔与经胸食管癌切除术的术后结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.007.
8
Evidence-based selective application of transhiatal esophagectomy in a high-volume esophageal center.在高容量食管中心,基于证据的选择性应用经食管裂孔食管切除术。
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1307-0.
9
The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II.CARDIA 试验方案:一项比较经胸食管切除术与经胸食管裂孔扩大胃切除术治疗 II 型胃食管结合部腺癌的多中心、前瞻性、随机、临床试验。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07152-1.
10
Postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy or a transhiatal gastrectomy in patients with esophagogastric junctional cancers: a prospective nationwide multicenter study.胸腹腔镜联合与经胸经裂孔食管胃切除术治疗食管胃结合部腺癌术后并发症的前瞻性全国多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01255-9. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcervical Endoscopic Esophageal Mobilization: An Approach to Transhiatal Esophagectomy.经宫颈内镜下食管游离术:一种经裂孔食管切除术的方法。
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Sep 28;3(1):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.011. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The Effect of Postoperative Sepsis on 1-Year Mortality and Cancer Recurrence Following Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinomas: A Retrospective Observational Study.术后脓毒症对食管胃交界腺癌经裂孔食管切除术后1年死亡率和癌症复发的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;17(1):109. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010109.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy.经胸与经食管裂孔食管切除术的比较结果。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗食管癌的长期生存比较。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e744-e748. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004645. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
Controversies in the surgical management of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
食管腺癌外科治疗中的争议
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):1919-1926. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-713. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
Impact of surgeon specialty on clinical outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer.外科医生专业对食管癌切除术治疗癌症的临床结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8309-8315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10391-5. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
微创与开放食管癌根治术的长期生存比较:全国倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e749-e757. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004708. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Cohort profile: a nationwide population-based retrospective assessment of oesophageal cancer in the Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort (FINEGO).队列简介:基于芬兰全国食管癌-胃癌队列(FINEGO)对食管癌进行的一项全国性基于人群的回顾性评估。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):e039575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039575.
5
Transhiatal versus transthoracic surgical approach for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.经食管裂孔与经胸入路手术治疗食管胃交界部 Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌的荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;14(11):1107-1117. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1806710. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Completeness of esophageal cancer diagnosis in the Finnish Cancer Registry and hospital discharge registry, a nationwide study in Finland.芬兰癌症登记处和医院出院登记处食管癌诊断的完整性:芬兰一项全国性研究
Acta Oncol. 2020 Nov;59(11):1329-1332. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1792547. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.胸腔镜与经胸经食管裂孔食管癌切除术:全国倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):175-183. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08760-8. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Open, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Approaches for Esophagectomy: What Is the Approach Algorithm?开放、微创和机器人手术治疗食管癌:采用何种手术入路方案?
Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Aug;30(3):269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.04.010.
9
Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.艾弗·刘易斯术式与麦基翁食管切除术:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库手术结果分析
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;68(4):370-379. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01290-w. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
10
Trends and results of oesophageal cancer surgery in Finland between 2004 and 2014.2004年至2014年芬兰食管癌手术的趋势与结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jan 1;57(1):107-113. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz189.