Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, 3052, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1033-1042. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01183-1. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Health economic analyses are essential for health services research, providing decision-makers and payers with evidence about the value of interventions relative to their opportunity cost. However, many health economic approaches are still limited, especially regarding the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this article, we discuss some limitations to current health economic models and then outline an approach to address these via the incorporation of genomics into the design of health economic models for CVD. We propose that when a randomised clinical trial is not possible or practical, health economic models for primary prevention of CVD can be based on Mendelian randomisation analyses, a technique to assess causality in observational data. We discuss the advantages of this approach, such as integrating well-known disease biology into health economic models and how this may overcome current statistical approaches to assessing the benefits of interventions. We argue that this approach may provide the economic argument for integrating genomics into clinical practice and the efficient targeting of newer therapeutics, transforming our approach to the primary prevention of CVD, thereby moving from reactive to preventive healthcare. We end by discussing some limitations and potential pitfalls of this approach.
健康经济分析对于卫生服务研究至关重要,为决策者和支付者提供有关干预措施相对于其机会成本的价值的证据。然而,许多健康经济方法仍然存在局限性,特别是在心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防方面。在本文中,我们讨论了当前健康经济模型的一些局限性,然后概述了一种通过将基因组学纳入 CVD 健康经济模型设计来解决这些问题的方法。我们建议,当随机临床试验不可行或不切实际时,可基于孟德尔随机化分析来构建 CVD 一级预防的健康经济模型,这是一种在观察性数据中评估因果关系的技术。我们讨论了这种方法的优势,例如将众所周知的疾病生物学纳入健康经济模型,以及这如何克服当前评估干预措施益处的统计方法。我们认为,这种方法可以为将基因组学纳入临床实践和针对新治疗方法的有效靶向提供经济论据,从而改变我们对 CVD 一级预防的方法,从被动的医疗保健转变为主动的医疗保健。最后,我们讨论了这种方法的一些局限性和潜在的陷阱。