Korczak Dieter, Dietl Markus, Steinhauser Gerlinde
GP Forschungsgruppe, Institut für Grundlagen- und Programmforschung, München, Deutschland.
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr 1;7:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/hta000093.
The HTA-report (HTA = Health Technology Assessment) deals with the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus type 2. In 2009 approximately 356,000 people died in Germany due to cardiovascular diseases. According to estimations about 6.3 million people are suffering from diabetes mellitus type 2. The interventions that are subsidized by the public health insurance are mainly focused on sufficient physical activities, healthy nutrition, stress management and the reduction of the consumption of addictive drugs and luxury food.
Which lifestyle-related measures and/or programmes for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and of the metabolic syndrome are effective? To what extent will the health status be improved by these offers? To what extent will existing health resources and skills be strengthened by these offers? Are there any differences regarding the effectiveness among the interventions with respect to different settings or subgroups? Which lifestyle-related interventions and/or programmes for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and of the metabolic syndrome are sustainable and cost-effective? Which outcome parameters are in the view of the contributors decisive for the evaluation of the effectiveness? In the view of the contributor are there different values between the outcome parameters? In the view of the payers and other actors are there different values between the outcome parameters? Which ethical and juridical factors have to be considered? Which social and/or socio-economic parameters influence the use of the services and effectiveness?
A systematic literature research is done in 35 databases. For the period 2005 to 2010, reviews, epidemiological and clinical studies as well as economical evaluations which deal with primary prevention programmes regarding cardiovascular diseases or the metabolic syndrome are included.
44 publications meet the inclusion criteria. These studies confirm the effectiveness of the primary prevention programmes. Physical activity programs seem to have a stronger effect than nutrition programmes. Psychological programmes prove as well effectiveness, if they include cognitive behaviour therapy. The identified economical studies indicate that programmes for cardiovascular prevention can be conducted cost-effectively. Interventions that focus on the general population turn out to be particularly cost-effective and sustainable.
There is a wide range of primary preventive effective lifestyle-related interventions with high evidence. The outcomes and results are consistent with the recommendations of the two identified evidence-based guidelines regarding the recommendations on lifestyle and healthy nutrition. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of primary prevention services is proven. With regard to the economical studies it is however worth noting that this result is based on very few publications. The transferability has to be critically assessed as the studies mainly originate from the American health system.
On the whole a comprehensive setting approach with educative, somatic, psychosocial and activity therapeutic components is recommended. The sustainability of a prevention intervention must be ensured from programme to programme. Long-term studies are necessary to make valid statements regarding the sustainable effectiveness: There is an essential deficit in the current practiced evaluation of the use of primary prevention services provided by the health insurance - mainly regarding the comprehensive setting approach - regarding the evidence-based evaluation of the prescribed preventive interventions. With regard to the ethical, social and economical evaluation the research situation is deficient. The situation has to be particularly analyzed for the socially deprived and one has to respond to their specific needs for prevention.
卫生技术评估报告(HTA = 卫生技术评估)涉及心血管疾病和2型糖尿病的一级预防。2009年,德国约有35.6万人死于心血管疾病。据估计,约有630万人患有2型糖尿病。由公共医疗保险补贴的干预措施主要集中在充足的体育活动、健康营养、压力管理以及减少成瘾性药物和高档食品的消费。
哪些与生活方式相关的措施和/或一级预防心血管疾病和代谢综合征的项目是有效的?这些措施能在多大程度上改善健康状况?这些措施能在多大程度上增强现有的健康资源和技能?不同环境或亚组的干预措施在有效性方面是否存在差异?哪些与生活方式相关的干预措施和/或一级预防心血管疾病和代谢综合征的项目是可持续且具有成本效益的?对于评估有效性而言,贡献者认为哪些结果参数是决定性的?在贡献者看来,结果参数之间是否存在不同的值?在支付者和其他行为者看来,结果参数之间是否存在不同的值?必须考虑哪些伦理和法律因素?哪些社会和/或社会经济参数会影响服务的使用和有效性?
在35个数据库中进行了系统的文献研究。纳入了2005年至2010年期间涉及心血管疾病或代谢综合征一级预防项目的综述、流行病学和临床研究以及经济评估。
44篇出版物符合纳入标准。这些研究证实了一级预防项目的有效性。体育活动项目似乎比营养项目有更强的效果。心理项目如果包括认知行为疗法也证明是有效的。已确定的经济研究表明,心血管预防项目可以经济高效地开展。针对普通人群的干预措施被证明特别具有成本效益且可持续。
有大量与生活方式相关且具有高度证据的一级预防有效干预措施。结果与两项已确定的关于生活方式和健康营养建议的循证指南的建议一致。此外,一级预防服务的成本效益得到了证明。然而,关于经济研究值得注意的是,这一结果基于非常少的出版物。由于这些研究主要源自美国卫生系统,其可转移性必须进行严格评估。
总体而言,建议采用一种综合的方法,包括教育、躯体、心理社会和活动治疗等组成部分。必须确保每个预防干预措施从项目到项目的可持续性。需要进行长期研究才能就可持续有效性做出有效的陈述:目前对医疗保险提供的一级预防服务使用情况的评估存在重大缺陷——主要是关于综合方法——在对规定的预防干预措施进行循证评估方面。在伦理、社会和经济评估方面,研究情况也很欠缺。必须特别分析社会弱势群体的情况,并针对他们特定的预防需求做出回应。