• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NIHSS<6 分且大血管闭塞患者再通成功的临床效果。

Clinical effect of successful reperfusion in patients presenting with NIHSS < 6 and large vessel occlusion.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.74 Linjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400010, China.

Department of Neurology, Army Medical Center of PLA, No.10 Changjiang Branch Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400042, China.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Oct;31(10):106684. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106684. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106684
PMID:36007262
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of reperfusion in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)< 6.

METHODS

It was a retrospective cohort study. The reperfusion grade was determined using the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score. The modified Rankin Score (mRS) ≤1 were defined as excellent and (mRS) ≤2 as favorable outcome at 3-month. Meanwhile, the all-cause mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and complications were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (86.4%) achieved reperfusion (TICI2B/3). Excellent outcome was achieved in 62 (70.5%) and favorable outcome in 69 (78.4%). All-cause death occurred in 2 (2.3%). The rate of excellent outcome in patients with TICI0,1,2A was 41.7%, with TICI2B 69.2%, and with TICI3 78.0% (p < 0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis related to excellent outcome, the OR(95% CI) was 5.68(1.35,23.95) for TICI3; the test for linear trend by entering categorical variables as continuous variables in the adjusted model (p for trend=0.02<0.05), defining TICI0,1,2A as reference. Subgroup analyses showed without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (OR, 14.29; 95% CI, 1.76-116.37) and with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (OR, 7.97; 95% CI,1.26-50.32), the excellent outcome further improved with TICI3. Findings were similar in favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that successful reperfusion was intensely connected with better functional outcomes for patients with LVO presenting with NIHSS<6 in the anterior circulation, especially MCA occlusion and pretreatment without IVT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)且美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分<6 的患者再灌注的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究。使用改良脑梗死溶栓(TICI)评分来确定再灌注等级。改良Rankin 量表(mRS)评分≤1 定义为 3 个月时的优效结局,mRS 评分≤2 定义为良效结局。同时记录全因死亡率、颅内出血和并发症。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估结局。

结果

76 例患者(86.4%)实现再灌注(TICI2B/3)。62 例(70.5%)患者获得优效结局,69 例(78.4%)患者获得良效结局。全因死亡 2 例(2.3%)。TICI0、1、2A 的优效结局发生率为 41.7%,TICI2B 为 69.2%,TICI3 为 78.0%(p<0.05)。在与优效结局相关的多变量逻辑回归分析中,TICI3 的 OR(95%CI)为 5.68(1.35,23.95);在调整模型中,将分类变量作为连续变量输入的线性趋势检验(p 趋势=0.02<0.05),将 TICI0、1、2A 定义为参照。亚组分析显示,无静脉溶栓(IVT)(OR,14.29;95% CI,1.76-116.37)和大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞(OR,7.97;95% CI,1.26-50.32)时,TICI3 可进一步改善优效结局。在良效结局方面,结果类似。

结论

本研究结果表明,前循环 LVO 且 NIHSS<6 的患者,再灌注成功与更好的功能结局密切相关,尤其是 MCA 闭塞和治疗前无 IVT 的患者。

相似文献

1
Clinical effect of successful reperfusion in patients presenting with NIHSS < 6 and large vessel occlusion.NIHSS<6 分且大血管闭塞患者再通成功的临床效果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Oct;31(10):106684. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106684. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Is Reperfusion Useful in Ischaemic Stroke Patients Presenting with a Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and a Proximal Large Vessel Occlusion of the Anterior Circulation?对于美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分较低且存在前循环近端大血管闭塞的缺血性卒中患者,再灌注治疗是否有效?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(5-6):305-312. doi: 10.1159/000468995. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
3
Intravenous thrombolysis + endovascular thrombectomy versus thrombolysis alone in large vessel occlusion mild stroke: a propensity score matched analysis.静脉溶栓联合血管内取栓与单纯溶栓治疗大血管闭塞性轻度卒中的倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Neurol. 2023 May;30(5):1312-1319. doi: 10.1111/ene.15722. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
4
Impact of endovascular reperfusion on low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score large-vessel occlusion stroke.血管内再灌注对低国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的大血管闭塞性卒中的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jul;29(7):104836. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104836. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Mechanical thrombectomy in acute middle cerebral artery M2 segment occlusion with regard to vessel involvement.急性大脑中动脉M2段闭塞时机械取栓与血管受累情况
Neurol Sci. 2020 Nov;41(11):3165-3173. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04430-5. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Early TICI 2b or Late TICI 3-Is Perfect the Enemy of Good?早期 TICI 2b 或晚期 TICI 3—完美是好的敌人吗?
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;32(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01048-8. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on patients with successful thrombectomy depends on final reperfusion grade: A retrospective study.静脉溶栓治疗对成功取栓患者的影响取决于最终再灌注分级:一项回顾性研究。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Aug;29(8):2377-2383. doi: 10.1111/cns.14227. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Recanalization of Emergent Large Intracranial Vessel Occlusion through Intravenous Thrombolysis: Frequency, Clinical Outcome, and Reperfusion Pattern.通过静脉溶栓实现紧急颅内大血管闭塞再通:频率、临床结局和再灌注模式。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;48(3-6):115-123. doi: 10.1159/000503850. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Reperfusion by endovascular thrombectomy and early cerebral edema in anterior circulation stroke: Results from the SITS-International Stroke Thrombectomy Registry.血管内血栓切除术再灌注和前循环卒中的早期脑水肿:来自 SITS-国际卒中取栓登记研究的结果。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Dec;18(10):1193-1201. doi: 10.1177/17474930231180451. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
10
Predictive factors of functional independence after optimal reperfusion in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke with indication for intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy.预测最佳再灌注后前循环缺血性卒中静脉溶栓联合机械取栓适应证患者功能独立性的因素。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):141-151. doi: 10.1111/ene.14509. Epub 2020 Oct 13.