Laboratory of Vaccinology and Applied Immunology, Kanazawa University School of Pharmacy, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan.
Department of Global Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-0934, Japan.
Parasitol Int. 2023 Feb;92:102652. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2022.102652. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
We previously demonstrated that boosting with adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 1 (AAV1) can induce highly effective and long-lasting protective immune responses against malaria parasites when combined with replication-deficient adenovirus priming in a rodent model. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of two different AAV serotypes, AAV1 and AAV5, as malaria booster vaccines following priming with the attenuated replication-competent vaccinia virus strain LC16m8Δ (m8Δ), which harbors the fusion gene encoding both the pre-erythrocytic stage protein, Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite (PfCSP) and the sexual stage protein (Pfs25) in a two-dose heterologous prime-boost immunization regimen. Both regimens, m8Δ/AAV1 and m8Δ/AAV5, induced robust anti-PfCSP and anti-Pfs25 antibodies. To evaluate the protective efficacy, the mice were challenged with sporozoites twice after immunization. At the first sporozoite challenge, m8Δ/AAV5 achieved 100% sterile protection whereas m8Δ/AAV1 achieved 70% protection. However, at the second challenge, 100% of the surviving mice from the first challenge were protected in the m8Δ/AAV1 group whereas only 55.6% of those in the m8Δ/AAV5 group were protected. Regarding the transmission-blocking efficacy, we found that both immunization regimens induced high levels of transmission-reducing activity (>99%) and transmission-blocking activity (>95%). Our data indicate that the AAV5-based multistage malaria vaccine is as effective as the AAV1-based vaccine when administered following an m8Δ-based vaccine. These results suggest that AAV5 could be a viable alternate vaccine vector as a malaria booster vaccine.
我们之前的研究表明,在啮齿动物模型中,与复制缺陷型腺病毒引发联合使用时,用腺相关病毒(AAV)1 型(AAV1)进行增强可以诱导针对疟疾寄生虫的高效且持久的保护性免疫应答。在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同的 AAV 血清型 AAV1 和 AAV5 在使用携带编码疟原虫环状孢子蛋白(PfCSP)和性阶段蛋白(Pfs25)融合基因的减毒复制型痘苗病毒株 LC16m8Δ(m8Δ)进行两剂量异源初免-加强免疫方案后的疟疾增强疫苗的效果。m8Δ/AAV1 和 m8Δ/AAV5 两种方案均诱导出强烈的抗 PfCSP 和抗 Pfs25 抗体。为了评估保护效力,免疫后用疟原子对小鼠进行了两次攻击。在第一次疟原子攻击中,m8Δ/AAV5 实现了 100%的无菌保护,而 m8Δ/AAV1 则实现了 70%的保护。然而,在第二次挑战中,在 m8Δ/AAV1 组中,第一次挑战中幸存的所有小鼠都得到了保护,而在 m8Δ/AAV5 组中,只有 55.6%的小鼠得到了保护。关于阻断传播的效果,我们发现两种免疫方案均诱导出高水平的减少传播活性(>99%)和阻断传播活性(>95%)。我们的数据表明,在 m8Δ 疫苗之后使用 AAV5 为基础的多阶段疟疾疫苗与 AAV1 为基础的疫苗一样有效。这些结果表明 AAV5 可以作为一种可行的替代疫苗载体作为疟疾增强疫苗。