Brown Matthew L, Javidan Pooya, Early Sam, Bugbee William
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Sheridan Pavilion -3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 408, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, El Cajon, CA, USA.
Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug 25;4(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00134-7.
The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period.
We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005-2009 and 2010-2014).
The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000.
At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000.
预计在美国进行的全膝关节置换术(TKA)数量将显著增加,翻修负担也会相应增加。随着病因不断演变以及翻修原因的变化,了解初次TKA失败的机制很重要。本研究的目的是确定我院早期和晚期失败的TKA翻修原因,并评估在10年时间内病因是否发生了变化。
我们确定了2005年至2014年在我院进行的258例TKA翻修病例。根据诊断对TKA翻修原因进行分类。我们还对初次TKA后两年内进行的TKA翻修(早期失败)和两年后进行的翻修(晚期失败)进行了亚组分析。TKA翻修病例还按初次TKA的年份(2000年之前和之后)以及进行TKA翻修的时间段(2005 - 2009年和2010 - 2014年)进行分组。
TKA翻修的最常见原因是感染(29.