Raimondi Federico, Cazzaniga Sara, Annibali Simona, Novelli Luca, Brivio Matteo, Pappacena Simone, Malandrino Luca, Bonaffini Pietro Andrea, Bianco Ilaria, Liggeri Noemi, Gritti Paolo, Lorini Ferdinando Luca, Sironi Sandro, Di Marco Fabiano
Pulmonary Medicine Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Department of Intensive Critical Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 30;12(8):1848. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081848.
Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) patients when pronated.
A retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and prone positioning was conducted.
Forty-five patients were included. On average, 50% of the overall lung volume was affected by the disease, as observed in the CT-scans, with ground glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations accounting for 44% and 4%, respectively. The abnormalities were mainly posterior, as demonstrated by posterior/anterior distribution ratios of 1.5 and 4.4 for GGO and consolidation, respectively. The median PaO/FiO ratio during NIV in a supine position (SP1) was 140 [IQR 108-169], which improved by 67% (+98) during prone positioning, on average. Once supine positioning was resumed (SP2), the improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as "responders"). We found no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of the extent ( = 0.92) and the distribution of parenchymal abnormalities seen in the baseline CT ( = 0.526).
Despite the lack of a priori estimation of the sample size, considering the absence of any trends in the differences and correlations, we can reasonably conclude that the baseline chest CT-scan does not predict a gas-exchange response in awake prone-positioned patients with COVID-19 related ARDS. Physicians dealing with this category of patients should not rely on the imaging at presentation when evaluating whether to pronate patients.
俯卧位通气常用于新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的非插管低氧血症患者,尽管仍缺乏确凿证据。本研究的目的是调查基线CT扫描能否预测COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者俯卧位通气时氧合的改善情况。
对接受无创通气(NIV)和俯卧位通气的COVID-19患者进行回顾性研究。
共纳入45例患者。CT扫描显示,平均总体肺容积的50%受疾病影响,其中磨玻璃影(GGO)和实变分别占44%和4%。异常主要位于后部,GGO和实变的后/前分布比分别为1.5和4.4。仰卧位(SP1)无创通气期间的中位PaO₂/FiO₂比值为140[四分位间距108 - 169],俯卧位通气期间平均改善67%(+98)。恢复仰卧位(SP2)后,28例患者(占总人数的62%,归类为“反应者”)维持了氧合改善。我们发现反应者和非反应者在基线CT所见的实质异常范围(P = 0.92)和分布(P = 0.526)方面无显著差异。
尽管未事先估计样本量,但考虑到差异和相关性无任何趋势,我们可以合理得出结论,基线胸部CT扫描不能预测清醒俯卧位的COVID-19相关ARDS患者的气体交换反应。处理这类患者的医生在评估是否让患者俯卧时不应依赖初诊时影像检查结果。