Jeong Seri, Lee Nuri, Lee Su Kyung, Cho Eun-Jung, Hyun Jungwon, Park Min-Jeong, Song Wonkeun, Kim Hyun Soo
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1, Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07441, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong 18450, Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 18;12(8):1998. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081998.
The demand for assays that can rapidly and accurately detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains high. We evaluated the performance of two rapid real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays (STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2) against conventional RT-qPCR assays (STANDARD M nCoV and Allplex SARS-CoV-2) for detecting SARS-CoV-2. A total of 225 swab samples were collected and tested using the four assays. The STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay showed 97.4% positive percent agreement (PPA) and 100.0% negative percent agreement (NPA) compared to the STANDARD M nCoV assay and Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assay. STANDARD M10 exhibited high performance except in samples with low viral loads (cycle threshold (Ct) > 30). Xpert Xpress showed PPA and NPA of 100.0% compared to the two conventional RT-qPCR assays. The kappa coefficient (Κ) showed nearly almost perfect agreement between each assay and conventional RT-qPCR assays. The correlations of Ct values between the two rapid RT-qPCR and conventional RT-qPCR assays were >0.8, indicating strong correlations. All included assays could detect SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants. The recently developed STANDARD M10 has a shorter turnaround time and random-access detection on automated devices, thereby facilitating efficient testing in emergency settings.
对能够快速、准确检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的检测方法的需求仍然很高。我们评估了两种快速实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测方法(STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2和Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2)相对于传统RT-qPCR检测方法(STANDARD M nCoV和Allplex SARS-CoV-2)检测SARS-CoV-2的性能。共收集了225份拭子样本,并使用这四种检测方法进行检测。与STANDARD M nCoV检测方法和Allplex SARS-CoV-2检测方法相比,STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2检测方法的阳性百分一致率(PPA)为97.4%,阴性百分一致率(NPA)为100.0%。除了病毒载量低(循环阈值(Ct)>30)的样本外,STANDARD M10表现出高性能。与两种传统RT-qPCR检测方法相比,Xpert Xpress的PPA和NPA均为100.0%。kappa系数(Κ)显示每种检测方法与传统RT-qPCR检测方法之间几乎完全一致。两种快速RT-qPCR检测方法与传统RT-qPCR检测方法之间的Ct值相关性>0.8,表明相关性很强。所有纳入的检测方法都能检测SARS-CoV-2变体,如Alpha、Beta和Gamma变体。最近开发的STANDARD M10周转时间更短,可在自动化设备上进行随机检测,从而便于在紧急情况下进行高效检测。