Makowski Dominique, Te An Shu, Pham Tam, Lau Zen Juen, Chen S H Annabel
School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639818, Singapore.
LKC Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639818, Singapore.
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;24(8):1036. doi: 10.3390/e24081036.
Complexity quantification, through entropy, information theory and fractal dimension indices, is gaining a renewed traction in psychophsyiology, as new measures with promising qualities emerge from the computational and mathematical advances. Unfortunately, few studies compare the relationship and objective performance of the plethora of existing metrics, in turn hindering reproducibility, replicability, consistency, and clarity in the field. Using the NeuroKit2 Python software, we computed a list of 112 (predominantly used) complexity indices on signals varying in their characteristics (noise, length and frequency spectrum). We then systematically compared the indices by their computational weight, their representativeness of a multidimensional space of latent dimensions, and empirical proximity with other indices. Based on these considerations, we propose that a selection of 12 indices, together representing 85.97% of the total variance of all indices, might offer a parsimonious and complimentary choice in regards to the quantification of the complexity of time series. Our selection includes , , , , , , , , , , , . Elements of consideration for alternative subsets are discussed, and data, analysis scripts and code for the figures are open-source.
通过熵、信息论和分形维数指标进行的复杂性量化,在心理生理学领域正重新受到关注,因为随着计算和数学的进步,出现了具有良好特性的新测量方法。不幸的是,很少有研究比较大量现有指标之间的关系和客观性能,这反过来又阻碍了该领域的可重复性、可复制性、一致性和清晰度。使用NeuroKit2 Python软件,我们在特征(噪声、长度和频谱)各异的信号上计算了112个(主要是常用的)复杂性指标。然后,我们根据计算权重、在潜在维度多维空间中的代表性以及与其他指标的经验接近度,系统地比较了这些指标。基于这些考虑,我们建议选择12个指标,它们共同代表了所有指标总方差的85.97%,这可能为时间序列复杂性的量化提供一个简洁且互补的选择。我们的选择包括 , , , , , , , , , , , 。文中讨论了替代子集的考虑因素,并且数据、分析脚本和图表代码都是开源的。