Suppr超能文献

S-1或卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂辅助化疗对Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期胃癌根治术后的疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Efficacy of S-1 or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II or III Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jeong Sang-Ho, Kim Rock Bum, Oh Sung Eun, An Ji Yeong, Seo Kyung Won, Min Jae-Seok

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon 51472, Korea.

Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Disease Center, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju 52727, Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;14(16):3940. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163940.

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) regimens tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) have predominated, however, there has been a lack of studies on their differences in efficacy. We conducted pairwise meta-analyses comparing the efficacy of S-1 and CAPOX regimens for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage II or III GC patients. Three studies were enrolled and analyzed using a forest plot for meta-analysis. Two of them were propensity score matching studies, and the remaining one was a retrospective observational study. In all stages, the five-year OS was not different between the two regimens (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.17; = 0.56). Additionally, the 5-year DFS was not different at any stage (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.18; = 0.21). After omitting the retrospective observational study, the five-year OS (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.53-3.73) and DFS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.57-3.44) of S-1 tended to be better in stage II, and the five-year OS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56-1.16) and DFS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.13) of CAPOX tended to be better in stage III, without statistical significance. : In the present meta-analysis, the five-year OS and DFS for stage II or III GC patients were comparable between S-1 and CAPOX regimens as AC.

摘要

辅助化疗(AC)方案替吉奥(S-1)和卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(CAPOX)一直占据主导地位,然而,关于它们疗效差异的研究却很缺乏。我们进行了成对荟萃分析,比较S-1和CAPOX方案对II期或III期胃癌(GC)患者总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的疗效。纳入三项研究并使用森林图进行荟萃分析。其中两项是倾向评分匹配研究,另一项是回顾性观察研究。在所有分期中,两种方案的五年总生存期无差异(风险比[HR]0.96,95%置信区间[CI]0.78 - 1.17;P = 0.56)。此外,在任何分期中五年无病生存期也无差异(HR 1.00,95% CI 0.85 - 1.18;P = 0.21)。剔除回顾性观察研究后,S-1方案在II期的五年总生存期(HR 1.40,95% CI 0.53 - 3.73)和无病生存期(HR 1.41,95% CI 0.57 - 3.44)有更好的趋势,而CAPOX方案在III期的五年总生存期(HR 0.81,95% CI 0.56 - 1.16)和无病生存期(HR 0.85,95% CI 0.63 - 1.13)有更好的趋势,但均无统计学意义。结论:在本荟萃分析中,对于II期或III期GC患者,作为辅助化疗的S-1和CAPOX方案的五年总生存期和无病生存期具有可比性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6e6/9406447/b38d50085446/cancers-14-03940-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验