Suppr超能文献

接受新一代药物洗脱支架植入的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死老年和年轻患者早期与延迟侵入性策略的3年结局比较

Comparison of 3-Year Outcomes between Early and Delayed Invasive Strategies in Older and Younger Adults with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

作者信息

Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Rha Seung-Woon, Choi Cheol Ung, Choi Byoung Geol, Kim Ji Bak, Park Soohyung, Kang Dong Oh, Park Ji Young, Park Sang-Ho, Jeong Myung Ho

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon 24289, Korea.

Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul 08308, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):4780. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164780.

Abstract

We evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of early invasive (EI) and delayed invasive (DI) strategies in older and younger adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to reflect current real-world practice. Overall, 4513 patients with NSTEMI were recruited from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health and divided into two groups according to age: group A (age ≥ 65 years, n = 2253) and group B (age < 65 years, n = 2260). These two groups were further divided into two subgroups: group EI (A1 and B1) and DI (A2 and B2). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent MI (re-MI), any repeat coronary revascularization, or stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). In both groups A and B, after multivariable-adjusted and propensity score-adjusted analyses, MACCE (group A, p = 0.137 and p = 0.255, respectively; group B, p = 0.171 and p = 0.135, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), non-CD, re-MI, any repeat revascularization, stroke, and ST rates were similar between the EI and DI groups. When including only those with complex lesions, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI groups. In the era of new-generation DESs, major clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI strategies in both older and younger adults with NSTEMI.

摘要

我们评估了接受新一代药物洗脱支架(DES)成功植入的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)老年和年轻患者早期侵入性(EI)和延迟侵入性(DI)策略的3年临床结局,以反映当前的实际临床实践。总体而言,4513例NSTEMI患者从韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-国立卫生研究院招募,并根据年龄分为两组:A组(年龄≥65岁,n = 2253)和B组(年龄<65岁,n = 2260)。这两组又进一步分为两个亚组:EI组(A1和B1)和DI组(A2和B2)。主要临床结局是发生主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),定义为全因死亡、再发心肌梗死(re-MI)、任何再次冠状动脉血运重建或中风。次要临床结局是明确或可能的支架血栓形成(ST)。在A组和B组中,经过多变量调整和倾向评分调整分析后,EI组和DI组之间的MACCE(A组,分别为p = 0.137和p = 0.255;B组,分别为p = 0.171和p = 0.135)、全因死亡、心源性死亡(CD)、非心源性死亡、re-MI、任何再次血运重建、中风和ST发生率相似。仅纳入有复杂病变的患者时,EI组和DI组之间的主要和次要临床结局无显著差异。在新一代DES时代,NSTEMI老年和年轻患者中,EI和DI策略之间的主要临床结局无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89b/9410439/5113b1dcc6c6/jcm-11-04780-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验