Suppr超能文献

全基因组测序在遗传性疾病诊断中的卫生技术评估:文献的范围综述。

Health technology assessment of whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of genetic disorders: a scoping review of the literature.

机构信息

School of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Aug 26;38(1):e71. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000496.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review is to map the available evidence about the use of health technology assessment (HTA) in the assessment of whole genome sequencing (WGS).

METHODS

A scoping review methodology was adopted. The population, concept, and context framework was used to build up the research question and to establish the eligibility criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted to implement a comprehensive search strategy. Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA organizations Web sites. Reports were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA, rapid reviews or other.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified seven reports. Five HTA organizations from five countries elaborated the reports: one full HTA, four rapid reviews, and two classified as others. The reports were mainly focused on the evaluation of the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genome-wide sequencing as well as informing policy questions by providing analyses of organizational and ethical considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Few HTA organizations are drafting reports for WGS. It is essential to stimulate a critical reflection during the elaboration of HTA reports for WGS to steer choices of decision makers in the establishment of priorities for research and policy and reimbursement rates.

摘要

目的

本范围综述旨在绘制关于在全基因组测序 (WGS) 评估中使用健康技术评估 (HTA) 的现有证据。

方法

采用范围综述方法。人群、概念和背景框架用于构建研究问题并确定资格标准。采用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目来实施全面的搜索策略。证据来自科学数据库和 HTA 组织网站。报告分为全 HTA、迷你 HTA、快速审查或其他。

结果

搜索策略确定了七份报告。来自五个国家的五个 HTA 组织详细阐述了这些报告:一份全 HTA、四份快速审查报告,以及两份归类为其他。报告主要侧重于评估全基因组测序的临床实用性和成本效益,以及通过分析组织和伦理考虑为政策问题提供信息。

结论

很少有 HTA 组织正在为 WGS 起草报告。在为 WGS 制定 HTA 报告时,必须进行批判性反思,以引导决策者在确定研究和政策以及报销率的优先事项方面做出选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验