School of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Aug 26;38(1):e71. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000496.
The aim of this scoping review is to map the available evidence about the use of health technology assessment (HTA) in the assessment of whole genome sequencing (WGS).
A scoping review methodology was adopted. The population, concept, and context framework was used to build up the research question and to establish the eligibility criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted to implement a comprehensive search strategy. Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA organizations Web sites. Reports were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA, rapid reviews or other.
The search strategy identified seven reports. Five HTA organizations from five countries elaborated the reports: one full HTA, four rapid reviews, and two classified as others. The reports were mainly focused on the evaluation of the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of genome-wide sequencing as well as informing policy questions by providing analyses of organizational and ethical considerations.
Few HTA organizations are drafting reports for WGS. It is essential to stimulate a critical reflection during the elaboration of HTA reports for WGS to steer choices of decision makers in the establishment of priorities for research and policy and reimbursement rates.
本范围综述旨在绘制关于在全基因组测序 (WGS) 评估中使用健康技术评估 (HTA) 的现有证据。
采用范围综述方法。人群、概念和背景框架用于构建研究问题并确定资格标准。采用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目来实施全面的搜索策略。证据来自科学数据库和 HTA 组织网站。报告分为全 HTA、迷你 HTA、快速审查或其他。
搜索策略确定了七份报告。来自五个国家的五个 HTA 组织详细阐述了这些报告:一份全 HTA、四份快速审查报告,以及两份归类为其他。报告主要侧重于评估全基因组测序的临床实用性和成本效益,以及通过分析组织和伦理考虑为政策问题提供信息。
很少有 HTA 组织正在为 WGS 起草报告。在为 WGS 制定 HTA 报告时,必须进行批判性反思,以引导决策者在确定研究和政策以及报销率的优先事项方面做出选择。