da Silva Cendon Duran Camila, da Paz Adriane Souza, Barreto Santiago Mittermayer
Department of Rheumatology, Serviços Especializados Em Reumatologia Da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Arch Rheumatol. 2021 Dec 24;37(2):300-310. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.9049. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Biological medications have been used with an increasing frequency to treat rheumatological diseases. Autoimmune events can be induced by these drugs, such as psoriasiform lesions, alopecia, lupus and, vasculitis, which more often affects the skin (small-sized vessels) and eventually other organs. In this review, we describe the clinical profile of patients with vasculitis induced by the main biological agents used in rheumatology.
We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. The PubMed database was used for searching eligible articles. We included case reports, case series, and letter to the editor of patients on anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-a) molecules, as well as tocilizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, rituximab, and abatacept, who had vasculitis induced by these agents.
Eighty-one articles were included for final analysis (n=89). Twenty-seven patients were using infliximab, 20 adalimumab, 18 etanercept, seven secukinumab, four certolizumab, four rituximab, three golimumab, three ustekinumab, two abatacept, and one tocilizumab. Unspecific leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) was the most common type of vasculitis (n=37), followed by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)- associated vasculitis (n=16). The medication was replaced with another biological molecule in 23 cases, with only four relapses. In six cases, the biological was maintained, but vasculitis worsened/persisted in one case, being necessary drug removal.
Infections, infusion reaction, cancer, and autoimmune events are well-known side effects of biological therapy. This review demonstrates that vasculitis is another adverse effect of this type of therapy, particularly the anti-TNF-a molecules, and LCV the most reported type of vasculitis.
生物制剂治疗风湿性疾病的使用频率日益增加。这些药物可诱发自身免疫事件,如银屑病样皮损、脱发、狼疮和血管炎,后者更常累及皮肤(小血管),最终也会影响其他器官。在本综述中,我们描述了由风湿病中使用的主要生物制剂诱发血管炎的患者的临床特征。
我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议进行了系统评价。使用PubMed数据库搜索符合条件的文章。我们纳入了关于使用抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(抗TNF-α)分子以及托珠单抗、乌司奴单抗、司库奇尤单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普后发生血管炎的患者的病例报告、病例系列及致编辑信。
81篇文章纳入最终分析(n = 89)。27例患者使用英夫利昔单抗,20例使用阿达木单抗,18例使用依那西普,7例使用司库奇尤单抗,4例使用赛妥珠单抗,4例使用利妥昔单抗,3例使用戈利木单抗,3例使用乌司奴单抗,2例使用阿巴西普,1例使用托珠单抗。非特异性白细胞破碎性血管炎(LCV)是最常见的血管炎类型(n = 37),其次是抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(n = 16)。23例患者的用药被换为另一种生物分子,仅4例复发。6例患者继续使用生物制剂,但1例患者的血管炎加重/持续存在,因此有必要停药。
感染、输液反应、癌症和自身免疫事件是生物治疗众所周知的副作用。本综述表明,血管炎是这类治疗的另一种不良反应,尤其是抗TNF-α分子,且LCV是报告最多的血管炎类型。