Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N. Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2022 Oct 12;115(5):1607-1619. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac121.
Pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), is the most economically important pest of pears grown in Washington State. Standard conventional management programs involve season-long broad-spectrum insecticide sprays. Although the industry uses some tools that are not disruptive to biological control, such as kaolin clay and selective insecticides, they are additions to broad-spectrum insecticides instead of replacements. Conventional sprays suppress pear psylla through the spring and early summer; however, disruption of biological control leads to pear psylla outbreaks near harvest. In 2018 and 2019, we tested two season-long programs that used only selective approaches. The programs began with either kaolin clay or reflective plastic mulch and were followed by identical spray programs using only selective insecticides. Programs were compared with an industry standard conventional program that used numerous broad-spectrum insecticides throughout the season, and a check program with no insecticides for pear psylla. Experiments were conducted using replicated 40-tree plots in a research orchard near Wenatchee, WA with high pear psylla pressure. In both years, selective programs had similar pear psylla densities to the industry standard program and all had lower pear psylla densities and fruit injury than the check. Both selective programs had lower fruit injury than the industry standard in the first year, and similar injury to the industry standard in the second year. Our results suggest kaolin clay and reflective mulch can effectively suppress pear psylla populations and injury in the early season and support season-long selective management programs without the use of broad-spectrum insecticides.
梨木虱,Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster)(半翅目:木虱科),是华盛顿州种植的梨树最重要的经济害虫。标准的常规管理方案包括整个季节使用广谱杀虫剂喷雾。尽管该行业使用了一些对生物防治没有干扰的工具,如高岭土和选择性杀虫剂,但它们是广谱杀虫剂的补充,而不是替代品。常规喷雾通过春季和初夏抑制梨木虱;然而,生物防治的破坏导致收获期附近梨木虱爆发。在 2018 年和 2019 年,我们测试了两种仅使用选择性方法的整个季节方案。这些方案要么从高岭土开始,要么从反光塑料覆盖物开始,然后使用仅选择性杀虫剂的相同喷雾方案。方案与整个季节使用多种广谱杀虫剂的行业标准常规方案以及没有梨木虱杀虫剂的对照方案进行了比较。实验在华盛顿州 Wenatchee 附近的一个研究果园使用重复的 40 棵树的地块进行,那里的梨木虱压力很高。在这两年中,选择性方案的梨木虱密度与行业标准方案相似,所有方案的梨木虱密度和果实损伤都低于对照方案。在第一年,这两个选择性方案的果实损伤均低于行业标准方案,而在第二年,其果实损伤与行业标准方案相似。我们的结果表明,高岭土和反光覆盖物可以有效地抑制早期季节的梨木虱种群和伤害,并支持不使用广谱杀虫剂的整个季节选择性管理方案。