• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用综合数据进行项目评估:来自该领域的建议。

Leveraging integrated data for program evaluation: Recommendations from the field.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy, United States.

University of Pennsylvania, Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy, United States.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2022 Dec;95:102093. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102093. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102093
PMID:36027757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9693710/
Abstract

Use of administrative data to inform decision making is now commonplace throughout the public sector, including program and policy evaluation. While reuse of these data can reduce costs, improve methodologies, and shorten timelines, challenges remain. This article informs evaluators about the growing field of Integrated Data Systems (IDS), and how to leverage cross-sector administrative data in evaluation work. This article is informed by three sources: a survey of current data integration efforts in the United States (U.S.) (N=63), informational interviews with experts, and internal knowledge cultivated through Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy's (AISP) 12+ years of work in the field. A brief discussion of the U.S. data integration context and history is provided, followed by discussion of tangible recommendations for evaluators, examples of evaluations relying on integrated data, and a list of U.S. IDS sites with publicly available processes for external data requests. Despite the challenges associated with reusing administrative data for program evaluation, IDS offer evaluators a new set of tools for leveraging data across institutional silos.

摘要

利用行政数据来辅助决策,如今在公共部门已十分普遍,这其中包括项目和政策评估。虽然这些数据的重复使用可以降低成本、改进方法并缩短时间,但仍存在挑战。本文旨在向评估人员介绍日益发展的综合数据系统(IDS),并探讨如何在评估工作中利用跨部门行政数据。本文的信息来源有三方面:一是对美国(U.S.)当前数据整合工作的调查(N=63),二是与专家的信息访谈,三是通过社会政策的可操作智能(AISP)12 年来在该领域积累的内部知识。文中简要介绍了美国的数据整合背景和历史,接着为评估人员提出了切实可行的建议,展示了一些依赖综合数据的评估案例,并列出了可公开获取外部数据请求流程的美国 IDS 网站。尽管在将行政数据重复用于项目评估方面存在挑战,但 IDS 为评估人员提供了一套新工具,可用于打破机构数据孤岛,实现数据的跨部门利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e282/9693710/8d386ba8fc8c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e282/9693710/8d386ba8fc8c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e282/9693710/8d386ba8fc8c/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging integrated data for program evaluation: Recommendations from the field.利用综合数据进行项目评估:来自该领域的建议。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Dec;95:102093. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102093. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Improving integration and coordination of funding, technical assistance, and reporting/data collection: recommendations from CDC and USAPI stakeholders.改善资金、技术援助以及报告/数据收集的整合与协调:美国疾病控制与预防中心及美国国际开发署参与方的建议
Pac Health Dialog. 2011 Mar;17(1):185-97.
3
The Role of Program Evaluation in Keeping Army Health "Army Strong": Translating Lessons Learned Into Best Practices.项目评估在保持陆军健康“陆军强大”方面的作用:将经验教训转化为最佳实践。
Mil Med. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):189-195. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab516.
4
5
Increasing Gender Integration in U.S. Marine Corps Recruit Training: Policy Recommendations and Rationales From an Interdisciplinary Study.提高美国海军陆战队新兵训练中的性别融合度:跨学科研究的政策建议和理由。
Mil Med. 2024 Jun 26;189(Supplement_2):94-103. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad209.
6
Conceptualisation and implementation of integrated disease surveillance globally: a scoping review.全球综合疾病监测的概念化与实施:一项范围综述
Public Health. 2024 May;230:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.02.018. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Leveraging Administrative Data for Program Evaluations: A Method for Linking Data Sets Without Unique Identifiers.利用行政数据进行项目评估:一种在没有唯一标识符的情况下链接数据集的方法。
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Jun;39(2):245-59. doi: 10.1177/0163278714547568. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
8
Program Evaluation of Population- and System-Level Policies: Evidence for Decision Making.人群和系统层面政策的方案评估:决策证据。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jan;42(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211016427. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Unconventional data, unprecedented insights: leveraging non-traditional data during a pandemic.非常规数据,前所未有的洞察:在大流行期间利用非传统数据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 7;12:1350743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1350743. eCollection 2024.
10
But does it work? Improving evaluations of sexuality education.但它有效吗?改善对性教育的评估。
SIECUS Rep. 1997 Aug-Sep;25(6):3-12.

本文引用的文献

1
At the Intersection of Homeless Encampments and Heroin Addiction: Service Use Barriers, Facilitators, and Recommendations from the City of Philadelphia's Encampment Resolution Pilot.在无家可归者营地和海洛因成瘾的交叉点:来自费城营地解决方案试点的服务使用障碍、促进因素和建议。
Soc Work Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;36(2):150-163. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1877591. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
2
A longitudinal evaluation of government-sponsored job skills training and basic employment services among U.S. baby boomers with economic disadvantages.经济劣势的美国婴儿潮一代接受政府资助的职业技能培训和基本就业服务的纵向评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Oct;82:101845. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101845. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Latent class analysis risk profiles: An effective method to predict a first re-report of maltreatment?
潜在类别分析风险概况:一种预测虐待首次再次报告的有效方法?
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Feb 6;80:101792. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101792.
4
Challenges in administrative data linkage for research.研究中行政数据链接的挑战。
Big Data Soc. 2017 Dec 5;4(2):2053951717745678. doi: 10.1177/2053951717745678.
5
Justice involvement among homeless individuals with mental illnesses: Are self-report and administrative measures comparable?患有精神疾病的无家可归者中的司法介入情况:自我报告和行政措施具有可比性吗?
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Apr;61:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
6
It's not as simple as it sounds: Problems and solutions in accessing and using administrative child welfare data for evaluating the impact of early childhood interventions.这并非听起来那么简单:获取和使用儿童福利管理数据以评估幼儿期干预措施影响时存在的问题与解决办法。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2015 Oct;57:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.015.
7
Examining drug treatment program entry of injection drug users: human capital and institutional disaffiliation.审视注射吸毒者进入戒毒治疗项目的情况:人力资本与机构脱离关系
Eval Program Plann. 2003 May;26(2):123-32. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00013-2.
8
Risk of fatal injury in young children following abuse allegations: evidence from a prospective, population-based study.虐待指控后幼儿致命伤害风险:一项前瞻性、基于人群的研究证据。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103(10):e39-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301516. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
9
Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.法庭监管下药物滥用治疗的成功实践:来自加利福尼亚州六个实施第36号提案的高效县的观点
Eval Program Plann. 2011 May;34(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
10
Record Linkage.记录链接
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1946 Dec;36(12):1412-6.