• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球健康伙伴关系中影响研究诚信的实践探索。

An exploration of practices affecting research integrity in global health partnerships.

机构信息

Department of Research Governance and Ethics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009092.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009092
PMID:36028285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9422887/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research integrity is central to good research practice yet it is under-researched in global health.

AIM

To identify and explore factors which promote or constrain adherence to research integrity principles in global health research partnerships, specifically at a UK higher education institution (HEI) and its low-to-middle-income country (LMIC) partners.

METHODS

Qualitative study using key informant interviews among researchers at a HEI and a number of its LMIC partners exploring their understanding of the principles of research integrity and experience of its implementation in relation to research.

RESULTS

Thirteen interviews, five from HEI and eight from partner organisations, were conducted. Analysis found that understanding of research integrity focused on issues relating to rigour and did not include 'care and respect'. Barriers to research integrity included, supra institutional factors such as funding flows, inequitable power relations, the competitive culture of the global health ecosystem and institutional psychosocial safety. Most respondents had direct or indirect knowledge of incidences of research misconduct.

CONCLUSION

Improved recognition of the importance of care and respect is key to improving the integrity of research conduct within global health partnerships.

摘要

背景

研究诚信是良好研究实践的核心,但在全球健康领域的研究还不够充分。

目的

确定和探讨在全球健康研究伙伴关系中促进或限制遵守研究诚信原则的因素,特别是在英国高等教育机构(HEI)及其与中低收入国家(LMIC)的合作伙伴关系中。

方法

采用关键知情人访谈的定性研究方法,在 HEI 和其一些 LMIC 合作伙伴的研究人员中进行,探讨他们对研究诚信原则的理解以及在与研究相关的实施经验。

结果

共进行了 13 次访谈,其中 5 次来自 HEI,8 次来自合作组织。分析发现,对研究诚信的理解主要集中在与严谨性相关的问题上,不包括“关心和尊重”。研究诚信的障碍包括超机构因素,如资金流动、不平等的权力关系、全球健康生态系统的竞争文化以及机构心理安全感。大多数受访者直接或间接了解到研究不端行为的事件。

结论

提高对关心和尊重重要性的认识是改善全球健康伙伴关系中研究行为诚信的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/cfdb4c4b58ba/bmjgh-2022-009092f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/a120291a0b21/bmjgh-2022-009092f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/f59bf65e4b1d/bmjgh-2022-009092f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/cfdb4c4b58ba/bmjgh-2022-009092f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/a120291a0b21/bmjgh-2022-009092f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/f59bf65e4b1d/bmjgh-2022-009092f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b66/9422887/cfdb4c4b58ba/bmjgh-2022-009092f03.jpg

相似文献

1
An exploration of practices affecting research integrity in global health partnerships.全球健康伙伴关系中影响研究诚信的实践探索。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009092.
2
Bending the Arc towards Equitable Partnerships in Global Health and Applied Training.《全球健康与应用培训中的公平伙伴关系》
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Nov 6;85(1):130. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2564.
3
Do International Health Partnerships contribute to reverse innovation? a mixed methods study of THET-supported partnerships in the UK.国际卫生伙伴关系是否有助于反向创新?对英国国际发展部支持的伙伴关系的一项混合方法研究。
Global Health. 2017 Apr 18;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0248-2.
4
Interview study exploring how global health partnership principles are enacted and recommendations for practice.访谈研究探索全球卫生伙伴关系原则的实施情况以及实践建议。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e076475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076475.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Ethical challenges in global research on health system responses to violence against women: a qualitative study of policy and professional perspectives.全球卫生系统应对针对妇女暴力研究中的伦理挑战:一项针对政策和专业观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01034-y.
7
The international partner universities of East African health professional programmes: why do they do it and what do they value?东非卫生专业项目的国际合作大学:他们为什么这样做以及他们看重什么?
Global Health. 2019 Jun 7;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0477-7.
8
Principles for increasing equity in WASH research: understanding barriers faced by LMIC WASH researchers.提高水环境卫生研究公平性的原则:了解 LMIC 水环境卫生研究人员所面临的障碍。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010990.
9
A Comparison of the Expectations and Experiences of Medical Students From High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries Participating in Global Health Clinical Electives.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家参加全球健康临床选修课程的医学生的期望与经历比较
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):45-56. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1347510. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Power imbalances and equity in the day-to-day functioning of a north plus multi-south higher education institutions partnership: a case study.权力失衡与一个北方+多南方高等教育机构合作关系的日常运作中的公平性:一个案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Mar 15;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02139-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Aligning the principles and practice of research integrity and research fairness in global health: a mixed-methods study.在全球健康领域协调研究诚信和研究公平的原则与实践:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Mar 22;9(3):e013917. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013917.

本文引用的文献

1
Racism in two UK global health institutions.英国两家全球卫生机构中的种族主义现象。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1287-1288. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00417-2. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Academia's Big Five: a normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities.学术界的五大要素:大学认知责任的规范分类法
F1000Res. 2019 Jun 13;8:862. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19459.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) - a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science.
重新思考科研中的成功、诚信与文化(第一部分)——一项关于科学领域成功的多主体定性研究
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00104-0.
4
Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight.去殖民化全球健康:跨国研究伙伴关系成为焦点。
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):518-523. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa073.
5
Participant understanding of informed consent in a multidisease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.南非农村多疾病社区健康筛查和生物库平台中参与者对知情同意的理解。
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):560-566. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa072.
6
Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) statement: guidelines for good epidemiological practice.桥梁研究诚信与全球健康流行病学(BRIDGE)声明:流行病学实践良好准则。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003236.
7
Africa should set its own health-research agenda.非洲应该制定自己的卫生研究议程。
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7784):567. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03627-9.
8
The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health.外来审视:全球卫生学术领域的作者身份
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 18;4(5):e002068. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002068. eCollection 2019.
9
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series.英国大学对《支持研究诚信契约》的遵守情况:横断面时间序列研究结果
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 16;7:e7292. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7292. eCollection 2019.
10
Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research.保护全球卫生研究独立性和完整性的行动。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 18;4(3):e001746. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001746. eCollection 2019.