Sun Ruifeng, Wang Ning, Mou Hai, Gao Can, Yu Lv, Li Wenshan, Li Tiancong, Huang Peiling, Gong Weijun
Beijing Rehabilitation Medicine Academy, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Pain and Rehabilitation, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1471-1481. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00426-5. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
The objective was to investigate the risk factors for poor pain control in patients with herpes zoster (HZ)-associated neuropathic pain treated with drugs combined with nerve block therapy. Neuropathic pain commonly follows HZ. Nerve block therapy is the most commonly used clinical treatment for such pain, combining anti-inflammation and analgesia to prevent peripheral sensitization of nerve.
Using clinical practice data from a cohort study at our research center, we established a multivariate logistic regression model to investigate potential risk factors for poor control of zoster-associated pain (ZAP) treated with drugs plus nerve block therapy, including demographic characteristics, complications, laboratory tests, and characteristics of HZ attacks.
Of the 429 patients with ZAP who received drugs plus nerve block therapy, 95 (22.14%) had poor pain control after treatment. The risk of poor pain control was closely related to presence of cancer (odds ratio (OR) 4.173, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.342-12.970), numerical rating scale score on admission (OR 1.929, 95% CI 1.528-2.434), and red blood cell count (OR 0.560, 95% CI 0.328-0.954). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.730. Goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow) was 0.874.
The risk of poor pain control in patients with ZAP increased as a result of certain patient characteristics and complications, especially severe pain before treatment and cancer.
目的是研究药物联合神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹(HZ)相关性神经病理性疼痛患者疼痛控制不佳的危险因素。神经病理性疼痛常继发于HZ。神经阻滞治疗是此类疼痛最常用的临床治疗方法,兼具抗炎和镇痛作用,可防止神经外周敏化。
利用我们研究中心一项队列研究的临床实践数据,建立多因素逻辑回归模型,以研究药物加神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹相关性疼痛(ZAP)控制不佳的潜在危险因素,包括人口统计学特征、并发症、实验室检查以及HZ发作的特征。
在429例接受药物加神经阻滞治疗的ZAP患者中,95例(22.14%)治疗后疼痛控制不佳。疼痛控制不佳的风险与癌症的存在密切相关(比值比(OR)4.173,95%置信区间(CI)1.342 - 12.970)、入院时数字评分量表得分(OR 1.929,95% CI 1.528 - 2.434)以及红细胞计数(OR 0.560,95% CI 0.328 - 0.954)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.730。拟合优度(Hosmer - Lemeshow)为0.874。
ZAP患者疼痛控制不佳的风险因某些患者特征和并发症而增加,尤其是治疗前的严重疼痛和癌症。