Department of Neurosurgery, Moriguchi-Ikuno Memorial Hospital.
Department of Neurosurgery, Chiari Ehlas Danlos Syndrome Center, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Lake Success.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Sep 15;62(9):400-415. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0078. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
We investigated the mechanism underlying Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) and classified it according to the morphometric analyses of posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and craniocervical junction (CCJ). Three independent subtypes of CM-I were confirmed (CM-I types A, B, and C) for 484 cases and 150 normal volunteers by multiple analyses. CM-I type A had normal volume of PCF (VPCF) and occipital bone size. Type B had normal VPCF and small volume of the area surrounding the foramen magnum (VAFM) and occipital bone size. Type C had small VPCF, VAFM, and occipital bone size. Morphometric analyses during craniocervical traction test demonstrated instability of CCJ. Foramen magnum decompression (FMD) was performed in 302 cases. Expansive suboccipital cranioplasty (ESCP) was performed in 102 cases. Craniocervical posterolateral fixation (CCF) was performed for CCJ instability in 70 cases. Both ESCP and FMD showed a high improvement rate of neurological symptoms and signs (84.4%) and a high recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (58.5%). CCF also showed a high recovery rate of the JOA score (69.7%), with successful joint stabilization (84.3%). CM-I type A was associated with other mechanisms that caused ptosis of the brainstem and cerebellum (CCJ instability and traction and pressure dissociation between the intracranial cavity and spinal canal cavity), whereas CM-I types B and C demonstrated underdevelopment of the occipital bone. For CM-I types B and C, PCF decompression should be performed, whereas for small VPCF, ESCP should be performed. CCF for CCJ instability (including CM-I type A) was safe and effective.
我们研究了 Chiari 畸形 I 型(CM-I)的发病机制,并根据后颅窝(PCF)和颅颈交界区(CCJ)的形态测量分析对其进行了分类。通过多项分析,我们在 484 例 CM-I 患者和 150 名正常志愿者中证实了三种独立的 CM-I 亚型(CM-I 类型 A、B 和 C)。CM-I 类型 A 的 PCF 体积(VPCF)和枕骨大小正常。类型 B 的 VPCF 正常,但枕骨大小正常的区域(VAFM)和枕骨体积较小。类型 C 的 VPCF、VAFM 和枕骨体积较小。在颅颈牵引试验期间的形态测量分析显示 CCJ 不稳定。302 例患者进行了枕骨大孔减压术(FMD)。102 例患者进行了扩张性枕下颅骨成形术(ESCP)。70 例 CCJ 不稳定患者行颅颈后外侧固定术(CCF)。ESCP 和 FMD 均显示出较高的神经症状和体征改善率(84.4%)和日本矫形协会(JOA)评分恢复率(58.5%)。CCF 也显示出较高的 JOA 评分恢复率(69.7%),关节固定稳定(84.3%)。CM-I 类型 A 与导致脑干和小脑下垂的其他机制有关(CCJ 不稳定和颅内腔与椎管之间的牵引和压力分离),而 CM-I 类型 B 和 C 则表现为枕骨发育不全。对于 CM-I 类型 B 和 C,应进行 PCF 减压,而对于较小的 VPCF,则应进行 ESCP。CCJ 不稳定(包括 CM-I 类型 A)的 CCF 是安全有效的。