Impact of center volume on conversion to thoracotomy during minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy.

BACKGROUND

Conversion to open is a potentially serious intraoperative event associated with minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy. However, the impact of institutional expertise on conversion to open has not been studied on a large scale. We used a nationally representative database to evaluate the association between hospital pulmonary lobectomy caseload and rates of conversion to open.

METHODS

All adults who underwent minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy were identified from the 2017 to 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Annual institutional caseloads of open and minimally invasive lobectomy were independently tabulated. Restricted cubic splines were used to parametrize the relationship between conversion to open and hospital volumes. Furthermore, multivariable regression was used to examine the association of conversion to open with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 52,886 patients who met study criteria, 4.9% required conversion to open. Compared to others, conversion to open patients were slightly younger (66 vs 67 years) and more commonly male (52.2 vs 42.3%, P < .001). After adjustment, male sex (adjusted odds ratio 1.42), history of tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio 1.35), and prior radiation therapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, P < .001) were associated with increased odds of conversion to open. Increasing minimally invasive lobectomy volume was linked to lower risk-adjusted rates of conversion to open, whereas greater open lobectomy caseload was associated with higher rates. Despite no impact on mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.11, P = .73), conversion to open was associated with a 1.2-day increment in length of stay and $5,600 in attributable costs.

CONCLUSION

The present study found institutional minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy caseload to be associated with decreased rates of conversion to thoracotomy, emphasizing the relevance of minimally invasive training among surgeons and perioperative staff.