Bhavana Kranti, Jha Rohit Kumar, Majumdar Somak
Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, Patna, India.
Present Address: Gandhinagar Hospital, Coal India Ltd, CCL, Ranchi, India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02057-8. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
Absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) has been used for many years in middle ear surgeries. It not only provides support to the graft and ossicular reconstruction materials but also helps in haemostasis and aeration of the middle ear. Although gelfoam is generally well tolerated but fibrosis and granulations in the mesotympanum have been attributed to its usage in some studies. This study was conducted to compare the results of middle ear surgeries with and without gel foam in terms of both objective and subjective improvements of symptoms. To study the outcome of tympanoplasty with and without gel foam in the middle war by measuring following attributes (for measuring outcomes) at an intervals of 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months after surgery. (a) Graft take up rate as evaluated by otoscopy. (b) Pre and post-operative hearing levels as measured on Pure Tone Audiogram. (c) Subjective improvement in symptoms of ear discharge, heaviness in ears, hearing loss and tinnitus. Study design-prospective clinical study. patients undergoing tympanoplasty type 1 between August 2018 to July 2019 were included in the study. Group A (n = 36) consisted of patients who underwent tympanoplasty with gel foam in the middle ear and Group B (n = 36) consisted of patients who underwent tympanoplasty without any gel foam inside the middle ear. The uptake of graft after tympanoplasty was almost similar in the patients using gelfoam (89%) and those without gelfoam (84%) at the end of 6 months. The improvement in the subjective symptoms of ear discharge and hearing loss at 6 weeks following the surgery was better in patients without gelfoam whereas, at the end of 6 months the improvement in these symptoms was similar in both the groups. The improvement in hearing 6 months following tympanoplasty as assessed by pure tone audiometry and was found to be the same in both the groups. Tympanoplasty can be performed safely without using any gelfoam in the ear. This not only makes patients comfortable early but also avoids any gelfoam induced fibrosis or granulations in the middle ear.
可吸收明胶海绵(明胶海绵)多年来一直用于中耳手术。它不仅为移植物和听骨重建材料提供支撑,还有助于中耳止血和通气。尽管明胶海绵通常耐受性良好,但在一些研究中,中鼓室的纤维化和肉芽组织被归因于其使用。本研究旨在比较使用和不使用明胶海绵的中耳手术在症状客观和主观改善方面的结果。通过在术后6周、12周和6个月时测量以下属性(用于测量结果),研究中耳内使用和不使用明胶海绵的鼓室成形术的结果。(a)通过耳镜检查评估的移植物吸收率。(b)纯音听力图测量的术前和术后听力水平。(c)耳漏、耳闷、听力损失和耳鸣症状的主观改善情况。研究设计——前瞻性临床研究。2018年8月至2019年7月期间接受I型鼓室成形术的患者纳入研究。A组(n = 36)由中耳使用明胶海绵进行鼓室成形术的患者组成,B组(n = 36)由中耳未使用任何明胶海绵进行鼓室成形术的患者组成。6个月结束时,使用明胶海绵的患者(89%)和未使用明胶海绵的患者(84%)鼓室成形术后移植物吸收率几乎相似。术后6周,未使用明胶海绵的患者耳漏和听力损失的主观症状改善较好,而在6个月末,两组这些症状的改善相似。鼓室成形术后6个月通过纯音听力测定评估的听力改善情况在两组中相同。中耳手术不使用任何明胶海绵也可安全进行。这不仅能使患者早期感觉舒适,还能避免中耳出现任何明胶海绵引起的纤维化或肉芽组织。