Suppr超能文献

局部胸膜麻醉下微波消融治疗胸膜下肺结节:我们的经验

Microwave ablation with local pleural anesthesia for subpleural pulmonary nodules: our experience.

作者信息

Meng Liangliang, Wu Bin, Zhang Xiao, Zhang Xiaobo, Wei Yingtian, Xue Xiaodong, Zhang Zhongliang, Zhang Xin, Li Jing, He Xiaofeng, Ma Li, Xiao Yueyong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Chinese PAP Beijing Corps Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;12:957138. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.957138. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the efficacy and safety of local pleural anesthesia (LPA) for relieving pain during microwave ablation (MWA) of pulmonary nodules in the subpleural regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2019 to December 2021, 88 patients with 97 subpleural nodules underwent percutaneous CT-guided MWA. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether LPA was applied; 53 patients with local pleural anesthesia during MWA; and 35 patients with MWA without LPA. The differences in technical success, pre-and post- and intra-operative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, complications of the procedure, and local progression-free survival (LPFS) between the two groups were assessed. Thus, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MWA combined with LPA for treating subpleural nodules.

RESULTS

In this study, the procedures in all patients of both groups achieved technical success according to pre-operative planning. There was no statistically significant difference in the pre-operative VAS pain scores between the two groups. Intra-operative VAS scores were significantly higher in the non-LPA (NLPA) group than in the LPA group. They remained significantly higher in the NLPA group than in the LPA group during the short postoperative period. Analgesics were used more in the NLPA group than in the LPA group intra- and postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference, especially during the MWA procedures. The overall LPFS rates were 100%, 98.333%, 98.333%, and 98.333% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively in the LPA group and 100%, 97.297%, 94.595%, and 94.595% postoperatively in the NLPA group, respectively. Tumor recurrence occurred in one and two patients with lung adenocarcinoma in the LPA and NLPA groups. The incidence of pneumothorax was significantly higher in the NLPA group (25,714%, 9/35) than in the LPA group (15.094%, 8/53), and there were three cases of pleural effusion (blood collection) and one case of pulmonary hemorrhage in the NLPA group.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous CT-guided MWA is a safe and effective treatment for subpleural pulmonary nodules. Applying a combined LPA technique can reduce the patient's pain and complications during and after the MWA. The long-term efficacy must be verified in more patients and a longer follow-up.

摘要

目的

探讨局部胸膜麻醉(LPA)在缓解胸膜下区域肺结节微波消融(MWA)过程中疼痛的有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

2019年6月至2021年12月,88例患者的97个胸膜下结节接受了经皮CT引导下的MWA。根据是否应用LPA将患者分为两组;53例患者在MWA期间接受局部胸膜麻醉;35例患者在MWA时未使用LPA。评估两组之间在技术成功率、术前、术中和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、手术并发症以及局部无进展生存期(LPFS)方面的差异。从而评估MWA联合LPA治疗胸膜下结节的有效性和安全性。

结果

在本研究中,两组所有患者的手术均按照术前规划取得了技术成功。两组术前VAS疼痛评分无统计学差异。非LPA(NLPA)组术中VAS评分显著高于LPA组。在术后短期内,NLPA组的VAS评分仍显著高于LPA组。NLPA组术中及术后使用镇痛药的次数均多于LPA组,差异有统计学意义,尤其是在MWA手术期间。LPA组术后1、3、6和12个月的总体LPFS率分别为100%、98.333%、98.333%和98.333%,NLPA组术后分别为100%、97.297%、94.595%和94.595%。LPA组和NLPA组分别有1例和2例肺腺癌患者出现肿瘤复发。NLPA组气胸发生率显著高于LPA组(25.714%,9/35),NLPA组有3例胸腔积液(血性)和1例肺出血。

结论

经皮CT引导下的MWA是治疗胸膜下肺结节的一种安全有效的方法。应用联合LPA技术可减轻患者在MWA期间及术后的疼痛和并发症。长期疗效必须在更多患者中进行验证并进行更长时间的随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ef/9411023/fd514dc312fe/fonc-12-957138-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验